Mosley v. Netflix Long Term Disability Plan

Filing 22

ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 3/9/11. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/10/2011)

Download PDF
Mosley v. Netflix Long Term Disability Plan Doc. 22 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 SEDGWICK, DETERT, MORAN & ARNOLD LLP Dennis G. Rolstad, SBN 150006 dennis.rolstad@sdma.com Erin A. Cornell, SBN 227135 erin.cornell@sdma.com One Market Plaza Steuart Tower, 8th Floor San Francisco, CA 94105-1008 Telephone: 415.781.7900 Facsimile: 415.781.2635 Attorneys for Defendants HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY and THE GROUP LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN FOR EMPLOYEES OF NETFLIX, Erroneously Sued as Netflix Long Term Disability Plan UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SHERRY MOSLEY, CASE NO. C10-03556 SBA ORDER GRANTING DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE 13 Plaintiff, 14 v. 15 16 17 Defendants. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SF/2121066v1 NETFLIX LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN, HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY, In accordance with the parties' Stipulation For Dismissal of Entire Action with Prejudice, it is hereby ORDERED that this entire action is dismissed with prejudice, including the complaint and any and all cross-claims or counter-claims, each party to bear her or its own attorneys' fees and costs. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: __3/9/11 ______________________________________ Honorable Saundra B. Armstrong -1- CASE NO. C10-03556 SBA [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?