Forouhar v. Statoil, ASA

Filing 95

ORDER re 94 Stipulation filed by Mitra N. Forouhar, Statoil, ASA. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 11/14/11. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/15/2011)

6

Brendan P. Cullen (SBN 194057)
([e-mail])
Laura Kabler Oswell (SBN 241281)
([e-mail])
Achyut J. Phadke (SBN 261567)
([e-mail])
SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP
1870 Embarcadero Road
Palo Alto, California 94303
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]

7

Attorneys for Specially Appearing Defendant Statoil ASA

1
2
3
4
5

8
9
10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12

OAKLAND DIVISION

13
14

MITRA N. FOROUHAR,
Plaintiff,

15
16

v.

17

STATOIL ASA,

18
19
20

Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 10-3623 (SBA)

[PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING
JURISDICTIONAL DISCOVERY AND
BRIEFING DEADLINES
Judge: The Hon. Saundra B. Armstrong
Courtroom: 1

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
SULLIVAN
&
CROMWELL LLP

[PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING JURISDICTIONAL DISCOVERY AND BRIEFING DEADLINES
CASE NO. 10-3623

1
2

The parties’ Joint Stipulation Continuing Discovery and Briefing Deadlines IS
APPROVED AND IS SO ORDERED.

3
4

Dated: ___________________________
THE HONORABLE SAUNDRA B. ARMSTRONG
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

5
6

Respectfully submitted,

7

/s/Brendan P. Cullen
Brendan P. Cullen (SBN 194057)
Laura Kabler Oswell (SBN 241281)
Achyut P. Phadke (SBN 261567)
Sullivan & Cromwell LLP
1870 Embarcadero Road
Palo Alto, California 94303
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]

8
9
10
11
12
13
14

Attorneys for Specially Appearing
Defendant STATOIL ASA

18

/s/Michael D. Seplow
Paul L. Hoffman (SBN 071244)
Michael D. Seplow (SBN 150183)
Schonbrun DeSimone Seplow Harris
Hoffman & Harrison LLP
723 Ocean Front Walk
Venice, California 90291
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]

19

Attorneys for Plaintiff

15
16
17

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
SULLIVAN
&
CROMWELL LLP

-1[PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING JURISDICTIONAL DISCOVERY AND BRIEFING DEADLINES
CASE NO. 10-3623

ORDER

1
2

The parties’ Joint Stipulation Continuing Discovery and Briefing Deadlines IS APPROVED

3

AND IS SO ORDERED. Within five (5) court days of the completion of mediation scheduled for

4

January 5, 2012, the parties will jointly inform the Court in writing that mediation has been completed

5

and, in the event that the mediation has not resulted in a settlement, the parties will propose a revised

6

schedule for jurisdictional discovery and briefing on Statoil’s motion to dismiss.

7

IT IS SO ORDERED.

8
9
10

Dated: November 14, 2011

______________________________
SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG
United States District Judge

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
SULLIVAN
&
CROMWELL LLP

-2[PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING JURISDICTIONAL DISCOVERY AND BRIEFING DEADLINES
CASE NO. 10-3623