Tennison v. Aetna Life Insurance Company et al
Filing
42
THIRD STIPULATION AND ORDER, Set/Reset Deadlines as to Opening brief due 1/23/12. Responses due by 2/14/2012. Replies due by 2/29/2012. Motion Hearing set for 3/20/2012 01:00 PM before Hon. Saundra Brown Armstrong.. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 10/21/11. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/24/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
KANTOR & KANTOR LLP
ALAN E. KASSAN, SBN 113864
akassan@kantorlaw.net
PETER S. SESSIONS, SBN 193301
psessions@kantorlaw.net
19839 Nordhoff Street
Northridge, California 91324
Telephone: (818) 886-2525
Facsimile: (818) 350-6272
Attorneys for Plaintiff
RENEE TENNISON
7
8
9
10
11
GORDON & REES LLP
TAD A. DEVLIN, SBN 190355
tdevlin@gordonrees.com
TAMAR KARAGUEZIAN, SBN 216233
tkaraguezian@gordonrees.com
275 Battery Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: (415) 986-5900
Facsimile: (415) 986-8054
12
13
Attorneys for Defendants
AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and the
ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN
14
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
16
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
17
18
RENEE TENNISON,
19
20
21
22
23
Plaintiff,
vs.
AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY;
ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP LONG
TERM DISABILITY PLAN,
Case No. 10-CV-03671 SBA
THIRD STIPULATION AND ORDER
CONTINUING TRIAL AND PRETRIAL
DEADLINES
Judge:
Honorable Saundra B. Armstrong
Defendants.
24
The parties hereby stipulate as follows:
25
WHEREAS the parties have agreed to mediation using the Court’s Alternative Dispute
26
Resolution (“ADR”) Program;
27
WHEREAS Jeffrey Lewis, Esq. was appointed as mediator by the Court’s ADR Program;
28
WHEREAS due to potential conflicts disclosed by Mr. Lewis, Aetna respectfully
-1THIRD STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CONTINUING TRIAL AND PRETRIAL DEADLINES
Case No. 10-CV-03671 SBA
1
2
3
declined Mr. Lewis’s assignment and requested reassignment to a new mediator;
WHEREAS the Court’s Alternative Resolution Department is currently reassigning a
mediator on this matter;
4
WHEREAS the parties agree to, and request the Court, continue the trial and pretrial
5
deadlines to allow time for the Alternative Resolution Department to reassign the matter to a
6
new mediator and to enable the parties to complete mediation before preparing briefs under the
7
currently set trial briefing schedule. The parties apologize for any inconvenience to the Court.
8
The parties, through their counsel, agree and propose the following dates, if convenient
9
with the Court:
10
•
The deadline to complete mediation shall be December 27, 2011;
11
•
The deadline for the parties to file their opening briefs be continued from
October 25, 2011 to January 23, 2012;
12
13
•
from November 8, 2011 to February 14, 2012;
14
15
•
The deadline for parties to file their reply briefs (if necessary) be
continued from November 15, 2011 to February 29, 2012;
16
17
The deadline for the parties to file their opposition briefs be continued
•
The hearing on the cross-motions to be continued from January 10, 2012
18
to March 5, 2012.
19
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
20
DATED: September 27, 2011
By: ____s/Peter S. Sessions________________________
Alan E. Kassan
Peter S. Sessions
Attorneys for Plaintiff
RENEE TENNISON
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
KANTOR & KANTOR LLP
DATED: September 27, 2011
GORDON & REES LLP
By: __/s/ Tad A. Devlin________ __________________
Tad A. Devlin
Tamar Karaguezian
Attorneys for Defendants
AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and the
ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP LONG TERM
DISABILITY PLAN
-2THIRD STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CONTINUING TRIAL AND PRETRIAL DEADLINES
Case No. 10-CV-03671 SBA
1
IT IS SO ORDERED that the above schedule of dates stipulated by the parties is approved with
2
the following modification: The hearing on the motion shall be held on March 20, 2012 at 1:00
3
p.m.
4
5
6
7
DATED: 10/21/11
_________________________________
Honorable Saundra B. Armstrong
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
AETNA/1065182/10806806v.1
-3THIRD STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CONTINUING TRIAL AND PRETRIAL DEADLINES
Case No. 10-CV-03671 SBA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?