Tennison v. Aetna Life Insurance Company et al

Filing 42

THIRD STIPULATION AND ORDER, Set/Reset Deadlines as to Opening brief due 1/23/12. Responses due by 2/14/2012. Replies due by 2/29/2012. Motion Hearing set for 3/20/2012 01:00 PM before Hon. Saundra Brown Armstrong.. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 10/21/11. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/24/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 KANTOR & KANTOR LLP ALAN E. KASSAN, SBN 113864 akassan@kantorlaw.net PETER S. SESSIONS, SBN 193301 psessions@kantorlaw.net 19839 Nordhoff Street Northridge, California 91324 Telephone: (818) 886-2525 Facsimile: (818) 350-6272 Attorneys for Plaintiff RENEE TENNISON 7 8 9 10 11 GORDON & REES LLP TAD A. DEVLIN, SBN 190355 tdevlin@gordonrees.com TAMAR KARAGUEZIAN, SBN 216233 tkaraguezian@gordonrees.com 275 Battery Street, Suite 2000 San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 986-5900 Facsimile: (415) 986-8054 12 13 Attorneys for Defendants AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and the ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN 14 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 18 RENEE TENNISON, 19 20 21 22 23 Plaintiff, vs. AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY; ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN, Case No. 10-CV-03671 SBA THIRD STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING TRIAL AND PRETRIAL DEADLINES Judge: Honorable Saundra B. Armstrong Defendants. 24 The parties hereby stipulate as follows: 25 WHEREAS the parties have agreed to mediation using the Court’s Alternative Dispute 26 Resolution (“ADR”) Program; 27 WHEREAS Jeffrey Lewis, Esq. was appointed as mediator by the Court’s ADR Program; 28 WHEREAS due to potential conflicts disclosed by Mr. Lewis, Aetna respectfully -1THIRD STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING TRIAL AND PRETRIAL DEADLINES Case No. 10-CV-03671 SBA 1 2 3 declined Mr. Lewis’s assignment and requested reassignment to a new mediator; WHEREAS the Court’s Alternative Resolution Department is currently reassigning a mediator on this matter; 4 WHEREAS the parties agree to, and request the Court, continue the trial and pretrial 5 deadlines to allow time for the Alternative Resolution Department to reassign the matter to a 6 new mediator and to enable the parties to complete mediation before preparing briefs under the 7 currently set trial briefing schedule. The parties apologize for any inconvenience to the Court. 8 The parties, through their counsel, agree and propose the following dates, if convenient 9 with the Court: 10 • The deadline to complete mediation shall be December 27, 2011; 11 • The deadline for the parties to file their opening briefs be continued from October 25, 2011 to January 23, 2012; 12 13 • from November 8, 2011 to February 14, 2012; 14 15 • The deadline for parties to file their reply briefs (if necessary) be continued from November 15, 2011 to February 29, 2012; 16 17 The deadline for the parties to file their opposition briefs be continued • The hearing on the cross-motions to be continued from January 10, 2012 18 to March 5, 2012. 19 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 20 DATED: September 27, 2011 By: ____s/Peter S. Sessions________________________ Alan E. Kassan Peter S. Sessions Attorneys for Plaintiff RENEE TENNISON 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 KANTOR & KANTOR LLP DATED: September 27, 2011 GORDON & REES LLP By: __/s/ Tad A. Devlin________ __________________ Tad A. Devlin Tamar Karaguezian Attorneys for Defendants AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and the ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN -2THIRD STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING TRIAL AND PRETRIAL DEADLINES Case No. 10-CV-03671 SBA 1 IT IS SO ORDERED that the above schedule of dates stipulated by the parties is approved with 2 the following modification: The hearing on the motion shall be held on March 20, 2012 at 1:00 3 p.m. 4 5 6 7 DATED: 10/21/11 _________________________________ Honorable Saundra B. Armstrong 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 AETNA/1065182/10806806v.1 -3THIRD STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING TRIAL AND PRETRIAL DEADLINES Case No. 10-CV-03671 SBA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?