U.S. Ethernet Innovations, LLC v. Acer, Inc. et al

Filing 1126

ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken DENYING ( 933 , 935 ) ADMINISTRATIVE MOTIONS TO SEAL. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/4/2014)

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

3
4

U.S. ETHERNET INNOVATIONS, LLC,

No. C 10-3724 CW

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING
ADMINISTRATIVE
MOTIONS TO SEAL
(Docket Nos. 933,
935)

5
6
7
8

v.
ACER, INC., et al.,
Defendants,
ATHEROS COMMUNICATIONS, INC., et
al.,

10
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

9

Intervenors.

11

________________________________/

12
The Court considers two administrative motions to file
13
documents under seal.

Intel filed two motions seeking to seal

14
references to U.S. Ethernet Innovations, LLC’s (USEI) Responses to
15
Interrogatories because they had been designated as “HIGHLY
16
CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEY’S EYES ONLY.”

See Docket Nos. 933, 935.

17
As the designating party, USEI must file a supporting declaration
18
within four days.

Civ. L.R. 79-5(e).

USEI did not do so with

19
respect to either motion.

Further, as the Responses to

20
Interrogatories contain a substantial amount of non-sealable
21
information, the requests to seal are not narrowly tailored.
22
Accordingly, the motions to seal are DENIED.
23
IT IS SO ORDERED.
24
25
Dated: 6/4/2014
26
27
28

CLAUDIA WILKEN
United States District Judge