U.S. Ethernet Innovations, LLC v. Acer, Inc. et al
Filing
1264
ORDER GRANTING PACER FEE EXEMPTION. Signed by Judge Wilken on 9/12/2014. (cwlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/12/2014)
1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
4
No. C 10-3724 CW
5
6
U.S. ETHERNET INNOVATIONS, LLC,
Plaintiff,
7
v.
8
9
ACER, Inc., et al.,
Defendants.
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
________________________________/
12
13
ORDER GRANTING PACER
FEE EXEMPTION
The Court has appointed Kwan Chan as Technical Advisor in
this case.
The Court finds that a PACER fee exemption is
14
appropriate to facilitate Mr. Chan’s work on this case.
The
15
16
standards established by the Judicial Conference for granting such
17
an exemption are to avoid unreasonable burdens and to promote
18
public access to such information.
19
order for the court to grant an exemption from the PACER fee.
20
21
22
Both standards must be met in
It would be unreasonable to burden Mr. Chan with payment of
this fee while he is working under appointment by and on behalf of
the Court. Because he is performing a public function as a
23
Technical Advisor in this case, public access to information will
24
25
26
27
28
be promoted if he has free access to the entire docket in this
case.
Thus, the Court finds that both standards have been met in
this instance and GRANTS Mr. Chan an exemption from PACER user
1
fees with respect to documents on the docket of the above-
2
captioned case and all related cases.
3
in place as long as Mr. Chan remains appointed as technical
4
advisor in the above-referenced case.
5
The exemption shall remain
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
7
8
Dated: 9/12/2014
CLAUDIA WILKEN
United States District Judge
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?