U.S. Ethernet Innovations, LLC v. Acer, Inc. et al
Filing
1278
ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken Granting 1277 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Attorney Andy Tindel terminated. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/27/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
KARL J. KRAMER (CA SBN 136433)
KKramer@mofo.com
DANIEL HUBIN (CA SBN 278987)
Dhubin@mofo.com
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
755 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, California 94304-1018
Telephone: 650.813.5600
Facsimile: 650.494.0792
Attorneys for Defendants and Counterclaimants
FUJITSU AMERICA, INC. AND FUJITSU LIMITED
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
U.S. Ethernet Innovations, LLC,
12
Case No.
4:10-cv-03724-CW(LB)
Plaintiff,
Defendants
13
Judge:
Hon. Claudia Wilken
Courtroom: 2, 4th floor
v.
14
MOTION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF
CERTAIN COUNSEL AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Acer, Inc., et al.,
15
16
17
18
Defendants/Counterclaimants FUJITSU AMERICA, INC. AND FUJITSU LIMITED
19
hereby request that Andy Tindel be removed as counsel of record and removed from the master
20
service list in the above-entitled action.
21
22
The undersigned attorneys from Morrison & Foerster LLP remain as counsel of record to
Defendants/Counterclaimants FUJITSU AMERICA, INC. AND FUJITSU LIMITED.
23
24
25
26
27
28
MOTION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF CERTAIN COUNSEL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CASE NO. 4:10-CV-03724-CW(LB)
pa-1666637
1
1
Dated: October 22, 2014
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
2
3
4
5
6
/s/ Karl J. Kramer
Karl J. Kramer
Daniel Hubin
Attorneys for Defendants
FUJITSU AMERICA, INC. AND
FUJITSU LIMITED
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
MOTION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF CERTAIN COUNSEL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CASE NO. 4:10-CV-03724-CW(LB)
pa-1666637
2
1
2
3
[PROPOSED] ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
5
Dated:
10/27/2014
6
7
8
HON. CLAUDIA WILKEN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
MOTION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF CERTAIN COUNSEL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CASE NO. 4:10-CV-03724-CW(LB)
pa-1666637
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?