U.S. Ethernet Innovations, LLC v. Acer, Inc. et al

Filing 744

ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken Granting 743 Stipulation FOR EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT SILICON INTEGRATED SYSTEMS CORPORATION'S MOTION TO DISMISS THIRD PARTY COMPLAINT. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/26/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

COOLEY LLP
MATTHEW J. BRIGHAM (191428) [e-mail]
KYLE D. CHEN (239501) [e-mail]
LAM K. NGUYEN (265285) [e-mail]
3000 El Camino Real
Five Palo Alto Square, 4th Floor
Palo Alto, California 94306
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Attorneys for Defendants/Third-Party Plaintiffs
ASUSTEK COMPUTER INC. and
ASUS COMPUTER INTERNATIONAL
[See signature page for additional counsel]

9
10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12

OAKLAND DIVISION

13
14

U.S. Ethernet Innovations LLC,

15

Case No. 4:10cv03724-CW (LB)

Plaintiff,

16

v.

17

[Related Cases: 4:10cv05254-CW and
4:10cv03481-CW]

Acer, Inc., et al.,

18

STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER
EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO
THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT
SILICON INTEGRATED SYSTEMS
CORPORATION’S MOTION TO
DISMISS THIRD PARTY
COMPLAINT AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER

Defendants.

19
20
21
22
23
24
25

Intel Corp., Nvidia Corp., Marvell
Semiconductor, Inc., Atheros
Communications, Inc. and Broadcom Corp.,

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

Intervenors,

DATE:
JUNE 27, 2013
TIME:
2:00 P.M.
COURTROOM: COURTROOM 2, 4TH FLOOR
JUDGE:
HON. CLAUDIA WILKEN

ASUSTeK Computer Inc. and ASUS
Computer International,
Third-Party Plaintiffs,

26
27
28

Silicon Integrated Systems Corp.,
Third-Party Defendant.
4:10cv03724-CW (LB)

1.

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO
SIS’S MOTION TO DISMISS THIRD PARTY COMPLAINT

1

Based on the request of Third-Party Plaintiffs ASUSTeK Computer Inc. and ASUS

2

Computer International (collectively “ASUS”), and pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1(b), 6-2, and

3

7-12 the parties submit this stipulated request for an Order extending the time for ASUS to

4

respond to Third-Party Defendant Silicon Integrated Systems Corporation’s (“SiS”) Motion To

5

Dismiss Third Party Complaint (“Motion to Dismiss” - Dkt. 731) by thirty (30) days, through and

6

including May 29, 2013 and for SiS to file any reply thereto by eight (8) days, through and

7

including June 13, 2013.

8

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2(a), the parties declare through their signature below that:

9

(1) In light of the Court moving the hearing by approximately 30 days (Dkt. 734), the

10

enlargement of time is requested to allow the parties to continue discussions about possible

11

resolutions to the Motion to Dismiss;

12

(2) This is the first request for enlargement of time relating to the Motion to Dismiss; and

13

(3) The time modification will not have an effect on the schedule for the case. The

14

hearing on the Motion to Dismiss is set for June 27, 2013.

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4:10cv03724-CW (LB)

2.

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO
SIS’S MOTION TO DISMISS THIRD PARTY COMPLAINT

1

Dated: April 25, 2013

2

COOLEY LLP
MATTHEW J. BRIGHAM
KYLE D. CHEN
LAM K. NGUYEN

3
4

By: /s/ Matthew Brigham

5

Matthew J. Brigham (191428)
([e-mail])
Five Palo Alto Square
Palo Alto, CA 94306
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]

6
7
8
9

Thomas J. Friel, Jr. (80065)
([e-mail])
101 California Street
5th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111-5800
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]

10
11
12
13

James P. Brogan, Esq. (155906)
([e-mail])
380 Interlocken Crescent, Suite 900
Broomfield, CO 80021-8023
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]

14
15
16

Attorneys for Defendants/Third-Party Plaintiffs
ASUSTEK COMPUTER INC. and
ASUS COMPUTER INTERNATIONAL

17
18
19

Respectfully submitted,

Dated: April 25, 2013

Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Deborah E. Fishman
Deborah E. Fishman (SBN 197584)
DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP
1841 Page Mill Road, Suite 150
Palo Alto, CA 94304
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Email: [e-mail]

20
21
22
23
24

Attorneys for Third-Party Defendant
SILICON INTEGRATED SYSTEMS CORP.

25
26
27
28
4:10cv03724-CW (LB)

3.

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO
SIS’S MOTION TO DISMISS THIRD PARTY COMPLAINT

1

FILER’S ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL RULE 5-1(I)(3)

2

I, Matthew J. Brigham, attest that concurrence in the filing of this STIPULATED

3

REQUEST FOR ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO THIRD-PARTY

4

DEFENDANT SILICON INTEGRATED SYSTEMS CORPORATION’S MOTION TO

5

DISMISS THIRD PARTY COMPLAINT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER has been obtained from

6

each of the other signatories. Executed this 25th day of April, 2013, at Palo Alto, California.

7
8
/s/ Matthew J. Brigham
Matthew J. Brigham

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4:10cv03724-CW (LB)

4.

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO
SIS’S MOTION TO DISMISS THIRD PARTY COMPLAINT

1

[PROPOSED] ORDER

2

Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing therefore;

3

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

4
5

Dated:

4/26/2013

6
7
Hon. Claudia Wilken
United States District Judge

8
9

1120314 v3/HN

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4:10cv03724-CW (LB)

5.

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO
SIS’S MOTION TO DISMISS THIRD PARTY COMPLAINT