Lee et al v. JP Morgan Chase N.A. et al

Filing 18

ORDER DISMISSING CASE Without Prejudice. Signed by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong, on 6/30/11. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/30/2011) Modified on 7/1/2011 (jlm, COURT STAFF).

1
2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

3

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

4

OAKLAND DIVISION

5

LISA AND RICHARD LEE, et al.,

Case No: C 10-3735 SBA

6

Plaintiffs,

ORDER

7

vs.
8

JP MORGAN CHASE, N.A., et al.,
9

Defendants.
10
11
12

On March 4, 2011, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m), this Court

13

issued an Order requiring Plaintiffs to serve their complaint within 45 days, as more than

14

120 days had passed since Plaintiffs filed the action. Dkt. 15. Plaintiffs also were required

15

to certify to the Court that they had effectuated service. The Court warned Plaintiffs that

16

failure to serve Defendants within the time specified in the Order would result in dismissal.

17

To date, Plaintiffs have not certified that they have served Defendants. Accordingly,

18

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the instant action is DISMISSED WITHOUT

19

PREJUDICE. The Case Management Conference set for July 7, 2011 is VACATED. The

20

Clerk is instructed to close the file.

21

IT IS SO ORDERED.

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Dated: June 30, 2011

_______________________________
SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG
United States District Judge