Yates v. Mangosteen et al
Filing
30
ORDER SETTING COMPLIANCE HEARING ON SERVICE OF COMPLAINT ON DEFENDANT Compliance Hearing set for 6/8/2012 09:01 AM before Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers.. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 4/19/12. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/19/2012)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
1
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
2
3
4
CRAIG YATES,
5
Plaintiff,
6
Case No.: C-10-03747-YGR
ORDER SETTING COMPLIANCE HEARING ON
SERVICE OF COMPLAINT ON DEFENDANT
vs.
7
MANGOSTEEN et al.,
8
Defendants.
9
10
11
TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD:
The Court continued the April 23, 2012 Case Management Conference until July 23, 2012 to
Northern District of California
United States District Court
12
allow Plaintiff to amend the complaint naming the new landlord/ owner of the real property that is the
13
subject of this litigation, to allow time for the new Defendant to answer, and to allow Plaintiff to
14
conduct an inspection with the new landlord and old tenant. Accordingly, the Court hereby sets a
15
Compliance Hearing regarding service of the complaint on the new defendant.
16
A Compliance Hearing shall be held on Friday, June 8, 2012 on the Court’s 9:01 a.m.
17
Calendar, in the Federal Courthouse, 1301 Clay Street, Oakland, California, in a courtroom to be
18
designated. No later than June 4, 2012, Plaintiff shall file either: (1) proof of service of the summons
19
and the complaint on all defendants; or (2) a motion for additional time to serve defendants based
20
upon good cause for failure to serve within the allowed time period. If compliance is complete, the
21
parties need not appear and the Compliance Conference will be taken off calendar.
22
23
Telephonic appearance will be allowed.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
24
25
26
27
28
April 19, 2012
________________________________________
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?