Cruz et al v. Goodman Networks, Inc.
Filing
40
ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 2/21/2013. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/21/2013)
1.
2
3
4
5
RANDALL B. AlMAN-SMlTH #124599
REED W. l. MARCY #191531
HALLIE VON ROCK #233152
CAREY A. JAMES #269270
aiman-smith~arcy
7677 oakport stre7su-ite_ 1020
oakland
california
94621
!:51 0.562.6800 1:510.562.6830
6
7
Attorneys for plaintiffs Jose Cruz,
Ri&oberto Jara, Manuel Garcia Jr.,
Gat! Neil, and Rudy Barron
8
9
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
13
JOSE CRUZ, RIGOBERTO JARA,
MANUEL GARCIA JR.1 GAIL NEIL, and
RUDY BARRON, indivtduals,
14
15
16
Plaintiffs,
vs.
Case No.: C 10-03820 YGR
Stipulation to Dismissal With Prejudice
Pursuant to Settlement- FRCP
41(a}(l)(A)(ii);
Order Dismissing Action With Pt•ejudice
GOODMAN NETWORKS, INC., and
DOES 1 through 50,
17
Defendants.
18
19
20
21
22
,________________________)
23
24
25
26
27
28
Stipulation and Order of Dismissal Wltl1 Prejudice Pursuant to Settlement
Crm, et at. v. Goodnum Networks, Iuc. eta/.
Case no. C 10-03820 SBA
1
Stipulation to Dismissal With Prejudice Pursuant to Settlement- FRCP 41(a)(l)(A)(ii).
2
The parties having reached agreement to settle this action, and said agreement calling
3
for the dismissal with prejudice of this action as to all plaintiffs, pursuant to Federal Rule of
4
Civil Procedure 41(a)(l)(A)(ii), all parties, through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate to
5
6
7
8
9
10
Dated:
~+'/-=""=-"+/-'r-""3'------~~
11
12
13
14
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
15
16
17
The parties having stipulated, and good cause appearing, now therefore,
IT IS ORDERED:
18
That this action is hereby dismissed with prejudice.
19
20
Dated: February 21, 2013
21
Hon. Yvonne Gonzales Rogers
Judge of the District Court
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Stipulation and Order of Dismissal With Prejudice Pursuant to Settlement
Cruz, eta/, v. Goodmrm Networks, Inc. el al.
Case no. C 10~03820 SBA
Pagel
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?