Centrify Corporation v. Quest Software, Inc.

Filing 73

ORDER Granting 71 Stipulation for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 7/29/2011. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/29/2011)

1
2
3
4
5

EDWARD V. ANDERSON (SBN 83148)
[e-mail]
DUY D. NGUYEN (SBN 246271)
[e-mail]
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
1001 Page Mill Road
Building 1
Palo Alto, CA 94304
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile:
650-565-7100

6
7
8
9
10

PHILIP W. WOO (SBN 196459)
[e-mail]
MENESH S. PATEL (SBN 241072)
[e-mail]
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
555 California Street
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile:
415-772-7400

11
12

Attorneys for Plaintiff Centrify Corporation

13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

14

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

15

OAKLAND DIVISION

16
17

CENTRIFY CORPORATION,

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Plaintiff,
v.
QUEST SOFTWARE, INC.
Defendant.

Case No. 10-3873-CW
STIPULATED MOTION AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER FOR LEAVE TO
FILE SECOND AMENDED
COMPLAINT

STIPULATION

1
2

Plaintiff Centrify Corporation (“Centrify”) and Defendant Quest Software, Inc. (“Quest”)

3

stipulate that pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(2), Centrify may file a Second

4

Amended Complaint for Patent Infringement (attached as Exhibit A) in the above-captioned action.

5

The Second Amended Complaint adds an explicit request for an accounting to determine the amount

6

of damages suffered by Centrify in between the close of fact discovery and the entry of final

7

judgment. The parties respectfully request an order granting leave for Centrify to file the Second

8

Amended Complaint.

9
10

Dated: July 26, 2011

SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP

11
/s/ Menesh S. Patel

12

Attorneys for Plaintiff Centrify Corp.

13
14
15

Dated: July 26, 2011

COOLEY LLP

16
/s/ Orion Armon

17

Attorneys for Defendant Quest Software, Inc.

18
19
20
21

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED:
7/29/2011
Dated: ___________________

___________________________________

22

The Hon. Claudia Wilken

23

United States District Judge

24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATED MOTION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
CASE NO. 10-3873-CW

1
2
3

SIGNATURE ATTESTATION
Pursuant to General Order No. 45(X)(B), I hereby certify that concurrence in the filing of
this document has been obtained from each of the other signatories shown above.

4
5

/s/ Menesh S. Patel

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATED MOTION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
CASE NO. 10-3873-CW