Franks v. Aetna Life Insurance Company et al

Filing 35

ORDER Granting 34 Stipulation to Further Continue Case Management Conference. Case Management Statement due by 3/29/2011. Case Management Conference set for 4/5/2011 02:00 PM. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 3/7/2011. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/7/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Gordon & Rees LLP 275 Battery Street, Suite 2000 San Francisco, CA 94111 TAD A. DEVLIN (SBN 190355) JOEL A. MORGAN (SBN 262937) GORDON & REES LLP 275 Battery Street, Suite 2000 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 986-5900 Facsimile: (415) 986-8054 Attorneys for Defendants AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, SPRINT/UNITED MANAGEMENT COMPANY AND THE SPRINT/UNITED MANAGEMENT COMPANY LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MICHAEL FRANKS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY; THE ) SPRINT/UNITED MANAGEMENT COMPANY ) LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN; ) SPRINT/UNITED MANAGEMENT COMPANY, in ) its capacity as Plan Administrator, ) ) Defendants. ) CASE NO. CV 10-03880 CW Judge Claudia Wilken STIPULATION AND ORDER TO FURTHER CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 TO THE COURT, THE PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: The parties in this action, Plaintiff Michael Franks and Defendants Aetna Life Insurance Company and Sprint/United Management Company Long Term Disability Plan, and Sprint/United Management Company (collectively referred to herein as "Defendants"), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows: WHEREAS the parties in this action are currently set to attend the Court's Case Management Conference scheduled for March 8, 2011; WHEREAS the parties have continued to discuss resolution of this matter and have made progress in that regard. To facilitate further discussions and avoid unnecessary time and expense and use of the Court's resources, the parties, through their attorneys, seek to continue the time -1_____________________________________________________________________________________________ STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO FURTHER CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE CV 10 03880 CW 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Gordon & Rees LLP 275 Battery Street, Suite 2000 San Francisco, CA 94111 for the parties to appear at to the March 8, 2011 Case Management Conference for at least 28 days. WHEREAS the Court conducts Case Management Conferences on Tuesdays at 2 p.m., all parties have agreed to further continue the current Case Management Conference until April 5, 2011 to allow parties the necessary time to further discuss resolution of this matter. IT IS SO STIPULATED: Dated: March 4, 2011 GORDON & REES LLP 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DATED: March 4, 2011 By:_______/s/__________________________ Tad Devlin Joel A. Morgan Attorneys for Defendants AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, SPRINT/UNITED MANAGEMENT COMPANY AND THE SPRINT/UNITED MANAGEMENT COMPANY LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN JULIAN M. BAUM & ASSOCIATES By: ______/s/__________________________ Julian M. Baum, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiff MICHAEL FRANKS -2_____________________________________________________________________________________________ STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO FURTHER CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE CV 10 03880 CW 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Gordon & Rees LLP 275 Battery Street, Suite 2000 San Francisco, CA 94111 PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED that the Case Management Conference in this case is continued to April 5, 2011. Date: March 7, 2011 ___________________________________ Claudia Wilken United States District Judge 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3_____________________________________________________________________________________________ STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO FURTHER CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE CV 10 03880 CW AETNA/1065387/9367992v.1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?