Northern California River Watch v. Oakland Maritime Support Services, Inc. et al
Filing
70
ORDER RE: DEFENDANTS OAKLAND MARITIME SUPPORT SERVICES, INC., AND WILLIAM ABOUDIS MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME RE: PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO COMPEL. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 9/30/2011. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/30/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
Northern District of California
United States District Court
12
NORTHERN CALIFORNIA RIVER
WATCH, et al.,
13
14
Plaintiffs,
vs.
15
16
Case No.: 10-cv-3912 CW (JSC)
ORDER RE: DEFENDANTS
OAKLAND MARITIME SUPPORT
SERVICES, INC., AND WILLIAM
ABOUDI’S MOTION FOR AN
EXTENSION OF TIME RE:
PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO COMPEL
OAKLAND MARITIME SUPPORT
SEVICES, INC.,
17
18
Defendants.
19
20
The Court has received the joint letter filed by Plaintiffs and Defendants Oakland
21
Maritime Support Service, Inc., and William Aboudi describing their meet and confer efforts
22
regarding Defendants’ request for an extension of time to respond to Plaintiffs’ Motions to
23
Compel and for Sanctions. The letter indicates that the parties were unable to come to an
24
agreement and that Plaintiffs continue to oppose Defendants’ request for an extension of time
25
based counsel Jay Aboudi’s need to withdraw as counsel of record in the action due to an on-
26
going medical condition. Counsel Aboudi represents Defendant William Aboudi and
27
Defendant Oakland Maritime Support Services, Inc. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 3-9(b), a
28
corporation cannot represent itself. See also Rowland v. California Men’s Colony, 506 U.S.
1
194, 201–02 (1993) (“It has been the law for the better part of two centuries ... that a
2
corporation may appear in the federal courts only through licensed counsel”). Accordingly,
3
Defendants, or at least the corporate Defendant, must be given an opportunity to find
4
replacement counsel.
5
In light of Plaintiffs’ failure to identify any irreparable prejudice and Defendants’
6
counsel’s illness, Defendants Oakland Maritime Support Service, Inc., and William Aboudi’s
7
motion for an extension of time to respond to Plaintiffs’ Motions to Compel and for Sanctions
8
is GRANTED. The hearing on these motions with respect to these Defendants only shall be
9
continued to November 17, 2011 at 9:00 a.m. Defendants’ opposition to the motions is due
10
11
Northern District of California
United States District Court
12
13
November 3, 2011 and Plaintiffs’ reply, if any, is due November 10, 2011.
The hearing on Plaintiffs’ Motions to Compel and for Sanctions will go forward on
October 6, 2011 as to Defendant Redevelopment Agency of the City of Oakland.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
14
15
Dated: September 30, 2011
_________________________________
JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?