Ravenswood City School District v. S. et al
ORDER by Judge ARMSTRONG finding as moot 40 Motion to Dismiss; finding as moot 26 Motion to Remove Incorrectly Filed Document (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/10/2010)
1 2 3 4 5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION Case No: C 10-3950 SBA ORDER TERMINATING MOTIONS
6 RAVENSWOOD CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT, 7 8 9
J.S., a minor student. Real Party in Interest, et 10 al.,
11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Defendants Office of Administrative Hearings and Jack O'Connell, in his capacity as State Superintendent of Public Instruction, and the California Department of Education, have filed motions to dismiss. Dkt. 34, 40. Plaintiff has since voluntarily dismissed these Defendants, thereby rendering moot the motions to dismiss. Separately, Defendant J.S. filed a motion to remove Docket Nos. 19 and 20, which apparently bear the wrong case number. Dkt. 26. However, the docket already reflects that these two documents were incorrectly filed and have been superseded by Docket Nos. 27 and 28. As such, Defendant J.S.'s motion is moot as well. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the aforementioned motions to dismiss and motion to remove documents are DENIED as moot. This Order terminates Docket Nos. 26, 34 and 40. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 9, 2010 ______________________________ SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?