Windermere Holdings, LLC v. U.S. Wall Decor, LLC et al

Filing 21

ORDER CONTINUING JANUARY 6, 2011 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE TO FEBRUARY 24, 2011. Signed by Judge Beeler on 12/28/10. (lblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/28/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 UNITED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 For the Northern District of California UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Northern District of California Oakland Division WINDERMERE HOLDINGS, LLC., v. Plaintiff, No. C 10-03955 LB ORDER CONTINUING JANUARY 6, 2011 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 U.S. WALL DECOR, LLC., et al., Defendants. _____________________________________/ On September 2, 2010, Plaintiff filed a Complaint alleging that Defendants had violated various trademark and copyright laws. Complaint, ECF No. 1. Defendants filed an Amended Answer on December 22, 2010 asserting various defenses, counterclaims, and a crossclaim against Thomas Kinkade. Amended Answer, ECF No. 18. The Court Clerk issued a Summons for a Third-Party Complaint on December 27, 2010 but Defendants have not yet filed a proof of service for Thomas Kinkade and he has not yet appeared in this matter. ECF No. 19. Currently, a Case Management Conference is on calendar for January 6, 2011 and the parties' consents to this Court's jurisdiction are due by December 30, 2010. See ECF No. 17. Because Defendants have not yet served Thomas Kinkade and he has not appeared in this case, the Court HEREBY VACATES the initial CMC that /// /// /// C 10-03955 ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 UNITED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 For the Northern District of California is set for January 6, 2011 and RESETS it to February 24, 2011 at 1:30 p.m. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 28, 2010 _______________________________ LAUREL BEELER United States Magistrate Judge 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 C 10-03955 ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?