Sedell v. Wells Fargo of California Insurance Services, Inc. et al
Filing
44
STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING MANDATORY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE HEARING DATE: Settlement Conference set for 5/31/2012 at 9:30 AM in Courtroom C, 15th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler on 3/30/2012. (ls, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/30/2012)
1 ALLEN MATKINS LECK GAMBLE
MALLORY & NATSIS LLP
2 BALDWIN J. LEE (BAR NO. 187413)
ALEXANDER NESTOR (BAR NO. 202795)
3 Three Embarcadero Center, 12th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111-4074
4 Phone: (415) 837-1515
Fax: (415) 837-1516
5 E-Mail: blee@allenmatkins.com
anestor@allenmatkins.com
6
Attorneys for Defendants
7 WELLS FARGO INSURANCE SERVICES USA, INC.,
H. DAVID WOOD, BRIAN M. HETHERINGTON,
8 SAMUEL L. JONES III, MARK W. STOKES, and
PAMELA HENDRICKS
9
10 STEVEN D. ZAVODNICK (BAR NO. 135419)
900 East Hamilton Ave., Suite 100
11 Campbell, CA 95008
Mailing Address:
12 P.O. Box 33247
Los Gatos, CA 95031
13 Phone: (408) 399-3100
Fax: (408) 384-5002
14
Attorneys for Plaintiff
15 STEVEN H. SEDELL
16
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
17
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – OAKLAND DIVISION
18 STEVEN H. SEDELL,
Plaintiff,
19
20
vs.
Case No. CV-10-04043 SBA (LB)
PARTIES' JOINT STIPULATION AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE
MANDATORY SETTLEMENT
CONFERENCE HEARING DATE
21 WELLS FARGO OF CALIFORNIA
INSURANCE SERVICES, INC., a California
22 Corporation, ACORDIA OF CALIFORNIA
INSURANCE SERVICES, INC., a California
23 Corporation, DAVID J. ZUERCHER, an
individual, H. DAVID WOOD, an individual,
24 BRIAN M. HETHERINGTON, an individual,
SAMUEL L. JONES III, MARK W. STOKES,
25 an individual PAMELA HENDRICKS, an
individual, AND does 1-100, inclusive,
26
Defendants.
27
28
LAW OFFICES
Allen Matkins Leck Gamble
Mallory & Natsis LLP
819661.01/SF
Case No. CV-10-04043 SBA (LB)
PARTIES' STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
TO CONTINUE MSC HEARING DATE
JOINT STIPULATION
1
Plaintiff STEVEN H. SEDELL ("Plaintiff") and Defendants WELLS FARGO
2
3 INSURANCE SERVICES USA, INC., H. DAVID WOOD, BRIAN M. HETHERINGTON,
4 SAMUEL L. JONES III, MARK W. STOKES, and PAMELA HENDRICKS (collectively,
5 “Defendants”) stipulate, as follows:
WHEREAS, Defendants' summary judgment motion was set for hearing on February 28,
6
7 2012;
8
WHEREAS, Judge Armstrong has taken the summary judgment motion under submission;
9
WHEREAS, the parties believe that the resolution of Defendants' summary judgment
10 motion would affect substantially the parties' settlement positions;
11
THEREFORE, the parties stipulate and respectfully request that this Court continue the
12 mandatory settlement conference currently scheduled on March 14, 2012, to April 27, 2012.
13
IT IS SO STIPULATED THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.
14
15 Dated: March 9, 2012
16
By:
17
18
/s/ Steven D. Zavodnick
STEVEN D. ZAVODNICK
Attorney for Plaintiff
19
20 Dated: March 9, 2012
ALLEN MATKINS LECK GAMBLE
MALLORY & NATSIS LLP
21
22
By:
23
24
/s/ Baldwin J. Lee
BALDWIN J. LEE
ALEXANDER NESTOR
Attorneys for Defendants
25
26
27
28
LAW OFFICES
Allen Matkins Leck Gamble
Mallory & Natsis LLP
819661.01/SF
-2-
Case No. CV-10-04043 SBA (LB)
PARTIES' STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
TO CONTINUE MSC HEARING DATE
ORDER
1
2
Pursuant to the parties' Joint Stipulation, and Good Cause appearing therefor, the Court
3 hereby orders that the settlement conference scheduled for March 14, 2012, is continued to April
4 27, 2012. May 31, 2012 at 9:30 a.m. The Settlement Conference Order issued
on March 7, 2011, Docket No. 15 remains in affect. Please report
5
to 450 Golden Gate Ave, 15th Floor, Courtroom C, SF, CA 94102.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
7
8 Dated: March 30, 2012
HON. LAUREL BEELER
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
LAW OFFICES
Allen Matkins Leck Gamble
Mallory & Natsis LLP
819661.01/SF
-3-
Case No. CV-10-04043 SBA (LB)
PARTIES' STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
TO CONTINUE MSC HEARING DATE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?