Vice v. Woodline USA, Inc.

Filing 43

ORDER Granting 42 Stipulation TO EXTEND TIME OF DEADLINE DATES ISSUED IN CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER OF FEBRUARY 8, 2011. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 6/20/2011. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/20/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 Kevin R. Martin (SBN 176853) PATTON MARTIN & SULLIVAN LLP 6600 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 250 Pleasanton, California 94566 Tel: 925-600-1800 Fax: 925-600-1802 kevin@pattonmartinsullivan.com Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant JAMES P. VICE 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN FRANCISCO/OAKLAND DIVISION 11 12 JAMES P. VICE, an individual, 13 Plaintiff, 14 vs. 15 WOODLINE USA, INC., a Tennessee Corporation, 16 17 18 No. 4:10-cv-04103-CW JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME OF DEADLINE DATES ISSUED IN CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER OF FEBRUARY 8, 2011 AND ORDER Defendant. Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6.2, Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant JAMES P. VICE and 19 Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff WOODLINE USA, INC. do hereby submit this Joint 20 Stipulation Extending Case Management Order Deadline Dates Issued on February 8, 2011 for 21 an additional 60 days from the presently deadline dates. 22 The parties submit this Stipulation on the basis that the parties participated in the court- 23 ordered Early Neutral Evaluation on May 5, 2011 , which was conducted later than originally 24 anticipated, and the parties are evaluating the results and considering settlement options and 25 believe with additional time the parties may likely resolve their issues. 26 Based on the foregoing, the parties respectfully request the Court grant an additional 60 27 days for the parties to comply with the claim construction proceedings according to the patent 28 local rules; and complete all fact discovery, including expert discovery as required by the Court’s JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER NO. 4:10-cv-04103-CW 1 1 Case Management Order of February 8, 2011 as follows: 2 1. Completion of Fact Discovery from June 15, 2011 to August 15, 2011; 3 2. Disclosure of identities and reports of expert witnesses from July 1, 2011 to 4 September 1, 2011; 5 3. Completion of Expert Discovery from August 3, 2011 to October 3, 2011; and 6 4. All other dates issued in the Court’s Case Management Order of February 8, 2011 7 shall remain the same. 8 9 June _______, 2011 Respectfully Submitted, 10 Patton Martin & Sullivan LLP 11 12 13 By: ________________________________ Kevin R. Martin 14 Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant JAMES P. VICE 15 16 17 18 June _______, 2011 Haverstock & Owens LLP 19 20 21 22 23 By: ________________________________ Chris Kao Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff WOODLINE USA, INC. 24 25 26 27 28 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER NO. 4:10-cv-04103-CW 2 1 2 ORDER Having considered the parties request and Joint Stipulation To Extend Time of Deadline 3 Dates issued in the Case Management Order of February 8, 2011, therefore, the Court hereby 4 orders that the deadline for the parties to complete all fact discovery, including expert discovery 5 as required by the Court’s Case Management Order of February 8, 2011 is extended for 60 days 6 as follows: 7 1. Completion of Fact Discovery is August 15, 2011; 8 2. Disclosure of identities and reports of expert witnesses September 1, 2011; 9 3. Completion of Expert Discovery is October 3,2011; 10 11 12 13 14 4. Compliance with the Claim Construction Proceedings of the Patent Local Rules is extended by 60 days; and 5. All other dates issued in the Court’s Case Management Order of February 8, 2011 shall remain the same. IT IS SO ORDERED. 15 16 6/20/2011 Date: _________________________ ___________________________________ HONORABLE CLAUDIA WILKEN United States District Court Judge 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER NO. 4:10-cv-04103-CW 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?