Vice v. Woodline USA, Inc.
Filing
43
ORDER Granting 42 Stipulation TO EXTEND TIME OF DEADLINE DATES ISSUED IN CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER OF FEBRUARY 8, 2011. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 6/20/2011. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/20/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
Kevin R. Martin (SBN 176853)
PATTON MARTIN & SULLIVAN LLP
6600 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 250
Pleasanton, California 94566
Tel: 925-600-1800
Fax: 925-600-1802
kevin@pattonmartinsullivan.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant
JAMES P. VICE
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN FRANCISCO/OAKLAND DIVISION
11
12
JAMES P. VICE, an individual,
13
Plaintiff,
14
vs.
15
WOODLINE USA, INC.,
a Tennessee Corporation,
16
17
18
No. 4:10-cv-04103-CW
JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME OF
DEADLINE DATES ISSUED IN CASE
MANAGEMENT ORDER OF FEBRUARY 8,
2011 AND ORDER
Defendant.
Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6.2, Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant JAMES P. VICE and
19
Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff WOODLINE USA, INC. do hereby submit this Joint
20
Stipulation Extending Case Management Order Deadline Dates Issued on February 8, 2011 for
21
an additional 60 days from the presently deadline dates.
22
The parties submit this Stipulation on the basis that the parties participated in the court-
23
ordered Early Neutral Evaluation on May 5, 2011 , which was conducted later than originally
24
anticipated, and the parties are evaluating the results and considering settlement options and
25
believe with additional time the parties may likely resolve their issues.
26
Based on the foregoing, the parties respectfully request the Court grant an additional 60
27
days for the parties to comply with the claim construction proceedings according to the patent
28
local rules; and complete all fact discovery, including expert discovery as required by the Court’s
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
NO. 4:10-cv-04103-CW
1
1
Case Management Order of February 8, 2011 as follows:
2
1. Completion of Fact Discovery from June 15, 2011 to August 15, 2011;
3
2. Disclosure of identities and reports of expert witnesses from July 1, 2011 to
4
September 1, 2011;
5
3. Completion of Expert Discovery from August 3, 2011 to October 3, 2011; and
6
4. All other dates issued in the Court’s Case Management Order of February 8, 2011
7
shall remain the same.
8
9
June _______, 2011
Respectfully Submitted,
10
Patton Martin & Sullivan LLP
11
12
13
By: ________________________________
Kevin R. Martin
14
Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim
Defendant JAMES P. VICE
15
16
17
18
June _______, 2011
Haverstock & Owens LLP
19
20
21
22
23
By: ________________________________
Chris Kao
Attorneys for Defendant and
Counterclaim Plaintiff WOODLINE USA, INC.
24
25
26
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
NO. 4:10-cv-04103-CW
2
1
2
ORDER
Having considered the parties request and Joint Stipulation To Extend Time of Deadline
3
Dates issued in the Case Management Order of February 8, 2011, therefore, the Court hereby
4
orders that the deadline for the parties to complete all fact discovery, including expert discovery
5
as required by the Court’s Case Management Order of February 8, 2011 is extended for 60 days
6
as follows:
7
1. Completion of Fact Discovery is August 15, 2011;
8
2. Disclosure of identities and reports of expert witnesses September 1, 2011;
9
3. Completion of Expert Discovery is October 3,2011;
10
11
12
13
14
4.
Compliance with the Claim Construction Proceedings of the Patent Local Rules is
extended by 60 days; and
5. All other dates issued in the Court’s Case Management Order of February 8, 2011
shall remain the same.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
15
16
6/20/2011
Date: _________________________
___________________________________
HONORABLE CLAUDIA WILKEN
United States District Court Judge
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
NO. 4:10-cv-04103-CW
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?