Reyna v. Reyna et al

Filing 13

ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANTS JOE REYNA AND JP MORGAN CHASE BANK TO FILE CONSENT OR DECLINE FORMS BY OCTOBER 29, 2010. Signed by Judge Beeler on 10/22/10. (lblc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/22/2010)

Download PDF
Reyna v. Reyna et al Doc. 13 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 UNITED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 For the Northern District of California UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Northern District of California Oakland Division THERISA REYNA, v. JOE REYNA, et al., Defendants. _____________________________________/ On September 30, 2010, the Court issued an order directing the parties to file a form informing the Court whether they consent to Magistrate Judge Beeler's jurisdiction or request reassignment of this case to a United States District Judge. See ECF No. 7. Plaintiff and Defendant FDIC have filed consents. See ECF Nos. 8, 10. However, Defendant Joe Reyna and JP Morgan Chase Bank have not filed either a consent or declination form. Accordingly, Mr. Reyna and JP Morgan Chase Bank shall file either the attached consent or declination form by October 29, 2010. If the Court does not receive consents by this date, the Court will submit the case for reassignment to a United States District Judge. Further, the current docket indicates that Mr. Reyna is an active defendant in this case. Because counsel for Mr. Reyna has not entered an appearance and Mr. Reyna has not appeared pro se, the Court directs Plaintiff to serve a copy of this order on Mr. Reyna. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 22, 2010 _______________________________ LAUREL BEELER United States Magistrate Judge Plaintiffs, No. C 10-04118 LB ORDER RE FILING CONSENT OR DECLINATION FORM 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 For the Northern District of California UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Northern District of California Oakland Division THERISA REYNA, v. JOE REYNA, Defendant(s). _____________________________________/ This civil case was randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler for all purposes including trial. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c), magistrate judges are designated to conduct any and all proceedings in a civil case, including trial and entry of final judgment, upon the consent of the parties. An appeal from a judgment entered by Judge Beeler may be taken directly to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in the same manner as an appeal from any other judgment of a district court. The parties have not filed written consents to Judge Beeler's jurisdiction. The parties also have the right to have their case assigned to a United States District Judge for trial and disposition. Accordingly, the parties shall inform the court whether they consent to Judge Beeler's jurisdiction or request reassignment to a United States District Judge. Each party shall file either a consent or declination form attached to this Order by October 29, 2010. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 22, 2010 _______________________________ LAUREL BEELER United States Magistrate Judge Plaintiff(s), No. C 10-04118 LB ORDER DIRECTING PARTIES TO FILE CONSENT/DECLINATION FORM 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER (C 10-04118) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 For the Northern District of California UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Northern District of California Oakland Division THERISA REYNA, Plaintiff(s), v. JOE REYNA, Defendant(s). ___________________________________/ CONSENT TO PROCEED BEFORE A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE In accordance with the provisions of Title 28, U.S.C. 636(c), the undersigned party hereby consents to have a United States Magistrate Judge conduct any and all further proceedings in the case, including trial and the entry of a final judgment. Appeal from the judgment shall be taken directly to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. No. C 10-04118 LB CONSENT TO PROCEED BEFORE A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: ________________________ ___________________________________ Signature Counsel for _________________________ (Plaintiff, Defendant or indicate "pro se") C 10-04118 LB 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 For the Northern District of California UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Northern District of California Oakland Division THERISA REYNA, Plaintiff(s), v. JOE REYNA, Defendant(s). ___________________________________/ No. C 10-04118 LB DECLINATION TO PROCEED BEFORE A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND REQUEST FOR REASSIGNMENT TO A UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 REQUEST FOR REASSIGNMENT TO A UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE The undersigned party declines to consent to the assignment of this case to a United States Magistrate Judge and requests the reassignment of this case to a United States District Judge. Dated: ________________________ Signature___________________________ Counsel for _________________________ (Plaintiff, Defendant, or indicate "pro se") C 10-04118 LB

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?