Dixon v. United States Postal Service
Filing
33
ORDER re 32 Stipulation filed by United States Postal Service. Plaintiff's opposition is due 5/16/11. Defendant's reply is due 5/26/11. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 05/10/2011. (dmrlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/10/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
William R. Morton (CSB # 43000)
Larry E. Lulofs (CSB # 88804)
MORTON, LULOFS & WOOD, LLP
180 Grand Avenue, Suite 1500
Oakland, CA 94612
Telephone: 510.628.0056
Facsimile: 510.444.8263
Attorneys for Plaintiff
DENICE DIXON
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
OAKLAND DIVISION
8
9
10
11
12
DENICE DIXON,
)
Plaintiff,
)
vs.
)
13
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
14
Defendant.
15
16
)
)
Case No. C10-04220DMR
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO CONTINUE DEFENDANT’S
MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE
PLEADINGS
Date: June 16, 2011
Time: 11:00 a.m.
Location: Courtroom 4, 3rd Floor
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
REQUEST TO CONTINUE AND PROPOSED ORDER
1
The plaintiff, Denice Dixon, (“Plaintiff”) and the federal defendant, United States of
2
America (“Federal Defendant”), by and through their counsel, hereby stipulate to the
3
following:
4
5
6
7
WHEREAS, the hearing on Defendant’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings in
this matter has been scheduled by this court for June 16, 2011 at 11:00 a.m.;
WHEREAS, the initial case management conference in this matter is currently
8
scheduled for June 16, 2011 at 11:00 a.m.
9
10
11
WHEREAS, counsel for the Plaintiff has ongoing treatments for illness which
require him to keep a part time schedule at the moment, so needs additional time to
12
complete Opposition to Defendant’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings.
13
14
15
WHEREAS, on April 29, 2011, the parties submitted a Stipulation and Proposed
Order to Continue the Defendant’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings and proposed the
16
following briefing schedule. The Plaintiff’s opposition brief is due May12, 2011, and the
17
18
19
20
Federal Defendant’s reply brief is due May 26, 2011;
WHEREAS, on May 6, 2011, the Court issued an Order Resetting Hearing Date on
Defendant’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings and Initial CMC setting the following
21
22
briefing schedule. The Plaintiff’s opposition brief is due May 16, 2011, and the Federal
23
Defendant’s reply brief is due May 23, 2011;
24
WHEREAS, counsel for the Federal Defendant will be out of the country during
25
26
27
28
May 18, 2011 through May 22, 2011 and will not have sufficient time to prepare a reply
brief pursuant to the briefing scheduled ordered on May 6, 2011;
2
REQUEST TO CONTINUE AND PROPOSED ORDER
1
ACCORDINGLY, the parties agree to following briefing schedule. The Plaintiff’s
2
opposition brief is due May 16, 2011, and the Federal Defendant’s reply brief is due May
3
31, 2011. The hearing on the Defendant’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings will
4
5
remain on June 16, 2011 11:00 a.m., and the Initial Case Management will remain on June
6
16, 2011 at 11:00 a.m.
7
So Stipulated.
8
Respectfully submitted,
9
10
Date: May 9, 2011
MORTON, LULOFS & WOOD, LLP
BY:
11
12
/s/ Larry E. Lulofs
LARRY E. LULOFS, Attorney for Plaintiff
DENICE DIXON
13
Date: May 9, 2011
14
15
16
17
18
MELINDA HAAG
United States Attorney
/s/ Melissa Sladden
_________________________________
MELISSA BROWN SLADDEN
Assistant United States Attorney
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
REQUEST TO CONTINUE AND PROPOSED ORDER
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER
2
3
The two Parties requesting, and good cause appearing, it is hereby ordered that the
4
Plaintiff’s opposition brief is due May 16, 2011, and the Federal Defendant’s reply
5
brief is due May 26, 2011. It is further ordered that court hearing on Defendant’s Motion
6
7
for Judgment on the Pleadings, and the initial case management conference will take place
8
on June 16, 2011 at 11:00 a.m. as set forth in the Court’s order dated May 6, 2011.
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
10
11
12
Date: __May 10_______, 2011
13
_____________________________
Hon. Donna M. Ryu
14
United States District Court Magistrate Judge
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
REQUEST TO CONTINUE AND PROPOSED ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?