Dixon v. United States Postal Service

Filing 33

ORDER re 32 Stipulation filed by United States Postal Service. Plaintiff's opposition is due 5/16/11. Defendant's reply is due 5/26/11. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 05/10/2011. (dmrlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/10/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 William R. Morton (CSB # 43000) Larry E. Lulofs (CSB # 88804) MORTON, LULOFS & WOOD, LLP 180 Grand Avenue, Suite 1500 Oakland, CA 94612 Telephone: 510.628.0056 Facsimile: 510.444.8263 Attorneys for Plaintiff DENICE DIXON 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION 8 9 10 11 12 DENICE DIXON, ) Plaintiff, ) vs. ) 13 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 14 Defendant. 15 16 ) ) Case No. C10-04220DMR STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS Date: June 16, 2011 Time: 11:00 a.m. Location: Courtroom 4, 3rd Floor 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 REQUEST TO CONTINUE AND PROPOSED ORDER 1 The plaintiff, Denice Dixon, (“Plaintiff”) and the federal defendant, United States of 2 America (“Federal Defendant”), by and through their counsel, hereby stipulate to the 3 following: 4 5 6 7 WHEREAS, the hearing on Defendant’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings in this matter has been scheduled by this court for June 16, 2011 at 11:00 a.m.; WHEREAS, the initial case management conference in this matter is currently 8 scheduled for June 16, 2011 at 11:00 a.m. 9 10 11 WHEREAS, counsel for the Plaintiff has ongoing treatments for illness which require him to keep a part time schedule at the moment, so needs additional time to 12 complete Opposition to Defendant’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. 13 14 15 WHEREAS, on April 29, 2011, the parties submitted a Stipulation and Proposed Order to Continue the Defendant’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings and proposed the 16 following briefing schedule. The Plaintiff’s opposition brief is due May12, 2011, and the 17 18 19 20 Federal Defendant’s reply brief is due May 26, 2011; WHEREAS, on May 6, 2011, the Court issued an Order Resetting Hearing Date on Defendant’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings and Initial CMC setting the following 21 22 briefing schedule. The Plaintiff’s opposition brief is due May 16, 2011, and the Federal 23 Defendant’s reply brief is due May 23, 2011; 24 WHEREAS, counsel for the Federal Defendant will be out of the country during 25 26 27 28 May 18, 2011 through May 22, 2011 and will not have sufficient time to prepare a reply brief pursuant to the briefing scheduled ordered on May 6, 2011; 2 REQUEST TO CONTINUE AND PROPOSED ORDER 1 ACCORDINGLY, the parties agree to following briefing schedule. The Plaintiff’s 2 opposition brief is due May 16, 2011, and the Federal Defendant’s reply brief is due May 3 31, 2011. The hearing on the Defendant’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings will 4 5 remain on June 16, 2011 11:00 a.m., and the Initial Case Management will remain on June 6 16, 2011 at 11:00 a.m. 7 So Stipulated. 8 Respectfully submitted, 9 10 Date: May 9, 2011 MORTON, LULOFS & WOOD, LLP BY: 11 12 /s/ Larry E. Lulofs LARRY E. LULOFS, Attorney for Plaintiff DENICE DIXON 13 Date: May 9, 2011 14 15 16 17 18 MELINDA HAAG United States Attorney /s/ Melissa Sladden _________________________________ MELISSA BROWN SLADDEN Assistant United States Attorney 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 REQUEST TO CONTINUE AND PROPOSED ORDER 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER 2 3 The two Parties requesting, and good cause appearing, it is hereby ordered that the 4 Plaintiff’s opposition brief is due May 16, 2011, and the Federal Defendant’s reply 5 brief is due May 26, 2011. It is further ordered that court hearing on Defendant’s Motion 6 7 for Judgment on the Pleadings, and the initial case management conference will take place 8 on June 16, 2011 at 11:00 a.m. as set forth in the Court’s order dated May 6, 2011. 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. 10 11 12 Date: __May 10_______, 2011 13 _____________________________ Hon. Donna M. Ryu 14 United States District Court Magistrate Judge 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 REQUEST TO CONTINUE AND PROPOSED ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?