Backweb Technologies, Ltd v. International Business Machines Corporation

Filing 60

STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING PROPOSED REVISED CONSTRUCTIONS re 59 Stipulation filed by International Business Machines Corporation. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 10/5/11. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/5/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Katherine Kelly Lutton (SBN 194971) lutton@fr.com Robert J. Kent (SBN 250905) rjkent@fr.com FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. 500 Arguello Street, Suite 500 Redwood City, CA 94070-1526 Telephone: (650) 839-5070 Facsimile: (650) 839-5071 Christopher O. Green (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) cgreen@fr.com FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. 1180 Peachtree Street, NE, 21st Floor Atlanta, GA 30309 Telephone: (404) 892-5005 Facsimile: (404) 892-5002 Ahmed J. Davis (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) adavis@fr.com FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. 1425 K Street NW, Suite 1100 Washington, DC 20005 Telephone: (202) 783-5070 Facsimile: (202) 783-2331 Attorneys for Defendant HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY 15 Spencer Hosie (SBN 101777) shosie@hosielaw.com George F. Bishop (SBN 89205) gbishop@hosielaw.com Diane S. Rice (SBN 118303) drice@hosielaw.com William P. Nelson (SBN 196091) wnelson@hosielaw.com HOSIE RICE LLP Transamerica Pyramid, 34th Floor 600 Montgomery Street San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 247-6000 Facsimile: (415) 247-6001 Attorneys for Plaintiff BACKWEB TECHNOLOGIES, LTD Charles K. Verhoeven (SBN 170151) charlesverhoeven@quinnemanuel.com Jennifer A. Kash (SBN 203679) jenniferkash@quinnemanuel.com Howard Chen (SBN 26015) Howardchen@quinnemanuel.com QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP 50 California Street, 22nd Floor San Francisco, CA 94111-4788 Telephone: (415) 875-6600 Facsimile: (415) 875-6700 16 Attorneys for Defendant INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES 17 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 19 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 20 OAKLAND DIVISION 21 BACKWEB TECHNOLOGIES, LTD., 22 CASE NO. C 10-4311 PJH CASE NO. C 10-4310 PJH Plaintiff, JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING PROPOSED REVISED CONSTRUCTIONS 23 vs. 24 25 HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY, PATENT CASE 26 Defendant. 27 28 JT STIP & PROPOSED ORDER RE PROPOSED REVISED CONSTRUCTIONS Case Nos. 4:10-CV-04310 PJH, 4:10-CV-04311 PJH 1 BACKWEB TECHNOLOGIES, LTD., 2 Plaintiff, 3 4 5 vs. INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION, Defendant. 6 7 8 WHEREAS at the September 28, 2011 Markman hearing, Honorable Phyllis J. Hamilton 9 ordered that Defendants Hewlett-Packard Company (“HP”) and International Business Machines 10 Corp. (“IBM”) and Plaintiff BackWeb Technologies, Ltd. (“BackWeb”) (collectively “the 11 Parties”) meet and confer in order to determine whether any compromises regarding the Parties’ 12 proposed claim constructions could be made; WHEREAS Honorable Phyllis J. Hamilton ordered that the Parties submit a letter detailing 13 14 any compromises reached by the Parties by Wednesday October 5, 2011; WHEREAS the Parties are currently in the process of meeting and conferring regarding 15 16 whether any compromises can be made in order to conserve judicial resources; WHEREAS the Parties believe that they will need until Friday October 14, 2011 to 17 18 complete the meet and confer process in a meaningful manner; NOW THEREFORE the parties hereby request the Court extend the deadline for 19 20 submitting the Parties’ statement on any claim construction compromises until Friday October 14, 21 2011. 22 Dated: October 4, 2011 FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. 23 By: /s/ Robert J. Kent Robert J. Kent 24 25 Attorneys for Defendant HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 2 JT STIP & PROPOSED ORDER RE PROPOSED REVISED CONSTRUCTIONS Case Nos. 4:10-CV-04310 PJH, 4:10-CV-04311 PJH 1 Dated: October 4, 2011 HOSIE RICE LLP 2 By: /s/ William P. Nelson Chen (by Robert J. Kent with permission) William P. Nelson 3 4 Attorneys for Plaintiff BACKWEB TECHNOLOGIES, LTD. 5 6 7 Dated: October 4, 2011 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN LLP 8 By: /s/ Howard Y. Chen (by Robert J. Kent with permission) Howard Y. Chen 9 10 Attorneys for Defendant INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45 Pursuant to General Order No. 45 section X-B regarding signatures, I attest under penalty of perjury that the concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from its signatories. 18 19 Dated: October 4, 2011 FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. 20 21 22 By: /s/ Robert J. Kent Robert J. Kent Attorneys for Defendant HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 JT STIP & PROPOSED ORDER RE PROPOSED REVISED CONSTRUCTIONS Case Nos. 4:10-CV-04310 PJH, 4:10-CV-04311 PJH 1 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 3 5 DATED: October ___, 2011 S UNIT ED 6 8 RT 50807757.doc H ER LI NO 9 11 FO The Honorable Phyllis J. Hamilton United States District Court Judge amilton yllis J. H h Judge P R NIA DERED SO OR _________________________________________ IT IS 7 10 RT U O 5 S DISTRICT TE C TA A 4 N F D IS T IC T O R C 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 JT STIP & PROPOSED ORDER RE PROPOSED REVISED CONSTRUCTIONS Case Nos. 4:10-CV-04310 PJH, 4:10-CV-04311 PJH

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?