Backweb Technologies, Ltd v. International Business Machines Corporation

Filing 63

STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE, ***Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 11/22/11. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/22/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

SPENCER HOSIE (CA Bar No. 101777)
[e-mail]
GEORGE F. BISHOP (CA Bar No. 89205)
[e-mail]
DIANE S. RICE (CA Bar No. 118303)
[e-mail]
WILLIAM P. NELSON (CA Bar No. 196091)
[e-mail]
HOSIE RICE LLP
Transamerica Pyramid, 34th Floor
600 Montgomery Street
San Francisco, CA 94111
[phone] Tel.
[phone] Fax
Attorneys for Plaintiff
BACKWEB TECHNOLOGIES, LTD.

11
12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
OAKLAND DIVISION

13
14
15
16

BACKWEB TECHNOLOGIES, LTD.,
Case No. C 10-4310 PJH
Plaintiff,

17
18

v.

INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES
19 CORPORATION,
20
Defendant.
21

STIPULATED MOTION FOR
DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF
CLAIMS AND COUNTERCLAIMS
BY BACKWEB TECHNOLOGIES,
LTD. AND INTERNATIONAL
BUSINESS MACHINES
CORPORATION, AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATED MOTION FOR DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

Case No. C 10-4310 PJH

1

Plaintiff BackWeb Technologies, Ltd. (“BackWeb”) and Defendant International

2 Business Machines Corporation (“IBM”), pursuant to Rule 41(A)(2) of the Federal Rules of
3 Civil Procedure, hereby stipulate and move for an order dismissing WITH PREJUDICE and
4 in their entirety (1) all claims or counterclaims brought by BackWeb against IBM and (2) all
5
6

claims or counterclaims brought by IBM against BackWeb, with each party to bear its own
costs, expenses and attorneys’ fees.

7
8

Dated: November 22, 2011

HOSIE RICE LLP
/s/ George F. Bishop_________________
GEORGE F. BISHOP
Attorneys for Plaintiff
BACKWEB TECHNOLOGIES, LTD.

9
10
11
12 Dated: November 22, 2011
13

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN, LLP

14
/s/Jennifer A. Kash
Jennifer A. Kash
Attorney for Defendant
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES
CORPORATION

15
16
17
18
19

I hereby attest pursuant to General Order 45.X.B. that concurrence in the electronic

20
filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatories.

21
22 DATED: November 22, 2011
23

/s/ George F. Bishop_______________
George F. Bishop

24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATED MOTION FOR DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

1

Case No. C 10-4310 PJH

UNIT
ED

3

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

RT
U
O

22nd
DATED this ___ day of November, 2011.

S
NO

6

RT

7

J

8
9

n

Hamilto

H

ER

yllis J.
udge Ph

FO

5

R NIA

_______________________________________
DERED
SO OR J. HAMILTON
HONORABLE PHYLLIS
IT IS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

4

LI

2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

A

1

N

D IS T IC T
R

OF

C

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATED MOTION FOR DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

2

Case No. C 10-4310 PJH