Oracle Amercia, Inc v. Micron Technology, Inc. et al

Filing 101

STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE. Oracle's reply shall be due on 3/9/12. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 3/12/12. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/12/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

Jerome A. Murphy (pro hac vice)
David D. Cross (pro hac vice)
Matthew J. McBurney (pro hac vice)
CROWELL & MORING LLP
1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20004
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 202-628-5116
E-mail: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

10

Suzanne E. Rode (CA Bar No. 253830)
CROWELL & MORING LLP
275 Battery Street, 23rd Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 415-986-2827
E-mail: [e-mail]

11

Counsel for Plaintiff Oracle America, Inc.

8
9

12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

13

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21

OAKLAND DIVISION
ORACLE AMERICA, INC.,
Plaintiff,
v.
MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. and
MICRON SEMICONDUCTOR PRODUCTS,
INC.,

Case No. 10-cv-04340 PJH
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING
SCHEDULE

Defendants.

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE
CASE NO. 10-CV-04340 PJH

1

WHEREAS, on January 25, 2012, Plaintiff Oracle America, Inc. (“Oracle”) and

2

Defendants Micron Technology, Inc. and Micron Semiconductor Products, Inc.’s (collectively,

3

“Micron”) filed a joint letter brief in connection with Micron’s motion to compel the production

4

of documents responsive to Micron’s Requests for Production No. 37 and 38 (“Requests”) (Dkt.

5

No. 87).

6
7

WHEREAS, on February 10, 2012, a telephonic hearing was held before this Court
regarding the motion;

8
9

WHEREAS, on February 16, 2012, this Court issued a Discovery Order (Dkt. No. 91)
(“Order”) requiring Oracle to submit a declaration setting forth the search it conducted in

10

connection with the Requests and permitting the parties to submit briefing regarding the

11

adequacy of Oracle’s search;

12
13
14
15
16

WHEREAS, Micron filed a brief contesting the adequacy of Oracle’s search on March 2,
2012;
WHEREAS, the Order sets March 7, 2012 as the deadline for Oracle to submit a reply to
Micron’s brief; and
WHEREAS, Oracle believes that additional time may allow the parties to resolve some

17

or all of the concerns raised in Micron’s brief without further need for intervention by this Court.

18

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED that Oracle’s

19

reply shall be due on March 9, 2012.

20
21

IT IS SO STIPULATED

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE
CASE NO. 10-CV-04340 PJH

1

DATE: March 6, 2012

2
3

CROWELL & MORING LLP

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP

7

/s/Matthew J. McBurney
Matthew J. McBurney
Crowell & Moring LLP
1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20004

/s/G. Charles Nierlich________________
G. Charles Nierlich
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP
555 Mission Street, Suite 3000
San Francisco, CA 94105

8

Counsel for Plaintiff Oracle America, Inc.

Counsel for Defendants Micron Technology,
Inc. and Micron Semiconductor Products,
Inc.

4
5
6

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18

ATTESTATION OF FILING
Pursuant to General Oder No. 45 § X(B), I hereby attest that I have obtained concurrence
in the filing of this Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Regarding Briefing Schedule from all the
parties listed in the signature blocks above.

By: _/s/Matthew J. McBurney___________
Matthew J. McBurney

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE
CASE NO. 10-CV-04340 PJH

1

[PROPOSED] ORDER

2

RT

ER

H

7

R NIA

Judge Jo

Spero

FO

seph C.

NO

12
DATE: March ____, 2012

LI

UNIT
ED

5
6

RT
U
O

4

ISTRIC
ES D
TC
AT
T

A

IT IS SO ORDERED.
S

3

C

N
F
D IS T IC T O
_____________________________
R
Honorable Joseph Spero
United States Magistrate Judge

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE
CASE NO. 10-CV-04340 PJH