Oracle Amercia, Inc v. Micron Technology, Inc. et al

Filing 56

STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE AS MODIFIED BY THE COURT re 55 Stipulation filed by Oracle America, Inc. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 5/18/11. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/18/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6

Jerome A. Murphy (pro hac vice)
Kent A. Gardiner (pro hac vice)
Matthew J. McBurney (pro hac vice)
CROWELL & MORING LLP
1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20004
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 202-628-5116
E-mail: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

10

Suzanne E. Rode (CA Bar No. 253830)
CROWELL & MORING LLP
275 Battery Street, 23rd Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 415-986-2827
E-mail: [e-mail]

11

Counsel for Plaintiff Oracle America, Inc.

7
8
9

12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
OAKLAND DIVISION
15
ORACLE AMERICA, INC.,

Case No. 10-cv-04340 PJH

16
Plaintiff,
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING
SCHEDULE AS MODIFIED BY THE COURT

17
v.
18
19

MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. and
MICRON SEMICONDUCTOR PRODUCTS,
INC.,

20
Defendants.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE
CASE NO. 10-CV-04340 PJH

1

WHEREAS, on May 9, 2011, Plaintiff Oracle America, Inc. (“Oracle”) filed a Motion to

2

Strike the Twenty-first Affirmative Defense Asserted in Defendants’ Micron Technology, Inc.

3

and Micron Semiconductor Products, Inc.’s (collectively, “Micron”) Amended Answer (“Motion

4

to Strike”) (Doc. No. 53);

5

WHEREAS, the hearing date noticed for the Motion to Strike is June 22, 2011;

6

WHEREAS, the Civil Local Rules require that Micron’s opposition to the Motion to

7

Strike be filed on or before June 1, 2011, and that Oracle’s reply to Micron’s opposition be filed

8

on or before June 8, 2011; and

9

WHEREAS, the parties believe that additional briefing time will enable them to more

10

fully address the important issues set forth in the Motion to Strike and that a later hearing date

11

will help alleviate the Court’s busy schedule;

12

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED as follows:

13

1.

Micron’s opposition to the Motion to Strike shall be due June 10, 2011;

14

2.

15

3.

Oracle’s reply to Micron’s opposition shall be due June 24, 2011; and
20
The hearing on the Motion to Strike shall be held on July 13, 2011, or as soon

16

thereafter as shall be decided by the Court.

17
18

IT IS SO STIPULATED

19
20

DATE: May 13, 2011

21
CROWELL & MORING LLP

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP

26

s/Jerome A. Murphy
Jerome A. Murphy
Crowell & Moring LLP
1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20004

s/Joel S. Sanders_________________
Joel S. Sanders
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP
555 Mission Street, Suite 3000
San Francisco, CA 94105

27

Counsel for Plaintiff Oracle America, Inc.

Counsel for Defendants Micron Technology,
Inc. and Micron Semiconductor Products,
Inc.

22
23
24
25

28
1

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE
CASE NO. 10-CV-04340 PJH

1
2

ATTESTATION OF FILING
Pursuant to General Oder No. 45 § X(B), I hereby attest that I have obtained concurrence

3

in the filing of this Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Regarding Briefing Schedule from all the

4

parties listed in the signature blocks above.

5
6

By: _s/Jerome A. Murphy______________
Jerome A. Murphy

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE
CASE NO. 10-CV-04340 PJH

[PROPOSED] ORDER

1
2
IT IS SO ORDERED.

4

S

RT

ER

H

10
11

R NIA

NO

9

_____________________________
Honorable Phyllis J. Hamilton
United States District milton Judge
is J. Ha Court
ge Phyll
Jud

FO

8

DERED

O OR
IT IS S

LI

7

18
DATE: May ____, 2011

UNIT
ED

6

RT
U
O

5

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

A

3

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE
CASE NO. 10-CV-04340 PJH