Orsolini et al v. Mead Clark Lumber Co. et al
Filing
26
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Beeler on 4/6/2011. (lblc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/6/2011)
Orsolini et al v. Mead Clark Lumber Co. et al
Doc. 26
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
A Professional Corporation rd 100 Montgomery Street, 23 Floor San Francisco, California 94104
Teresa S. Renaker, No. 187800 Lindsay Nako, No. 239090 Julie Wilensky, No. 271765 LEWIS, FEINBERG, LEE, RENAKER & JACKSON P.C. 476 9th Street Oakland, CA 94607 Telephone: (510) 839-6824 Facsimile: (510) 839-7839 trenaker@lewisfeinberg.com lnako@lewisfeinberg.com jwilensky@lewisfeinberg.com J. TIMOTHY NARDELL, No. 184444 NARDELL CHITSAZ & ASSOCIATES LLP 790 Mission Avenue San Rafael, CA 94901 Telephone: (415) 485-2200 Facsimilie: (415) 457-1420 tim@ncalegal.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs R. Bradford Huss, No. 71303 Virginia H. Perkins, No. 215832 Michelle Schuller, No. 255787 TRUCKER HUSS A Professional Corporation 100 Montgomery Street, 23rd Floor San Francisco, California 94104 Telephone: (415) 788-3111 Facsimile: (415) 421-2017 E-mail: bhuss@truckerhuss.com vperkins@truckerhuss.com mschuller@truckerhuss.com Attorneys for Defendants UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION MARIO L. ORSOLINI and ANDREW M. LEVINE, Plaintiffs, Case No. C10- 04478 SBA (LB) [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Trucker Huss
vs. 25 26 27 Defendants. 28
[PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER; Case No. 10-cv-04478 SBA (LB)
#1159073
MEAD CLARK LUMBER CO. AKA MEAD CLARK LUMBER COMPANY, INC. and RANDAL J. DESTRUEL,
1
Dockets.Justia.com
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
A Professional Corporation rd 100 Montgomery Street, 23 Floor San Francisco, California 94104
1.
PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS Disclosure and discovery activity in this action are likely to involve production of
confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the court to enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment under the applicable legal principles. The parties further acknowledge, as set forth in Section 10.3, below, that this Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle them to file confidential information under seal; Civil Local Rule 79-5 sets forth the procedures that must be followed and the standards that will be applied when a party seeks permission from the court to file material under seal. 2. DEFINITIONS 2.1 Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation of
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Trucker Huss
information or items under this Order. 2.2 "CONFIDENTIAL" Information or Items: information (regardless of how it
is generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c). 2.3 Counsel (without qualifier): Outside Counsel of Record and House Counsel
(as well as their support staff). 2.4 Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or
items that it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as "CONFIDENTIAL" or "HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY. 2.5 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless of the
medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, among other things, testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or generated in disclosures or responses to discovery in this matter. 2.6 Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter 2
[PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER; Case No. 10-cv-04478 SBA (LB)
#1159073
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
A Professional Corporation rd 100 Montgomery Street, 23 Floor San Francisco, California 94104
pertinent to the litigation who (1) has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as an expert witness or as a consultant in this action, (2) is not a past or current employee of a Party or of a Party's competitor, and (3) at the time of retention, is not anticipated to become an employee of a Party or of a Party's competitor. 2.7 "HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY" Information
or Items: extremely sensitive "Confidential Information or Items," disclosure of which to another Party or Non-Party would create a substantial risk of serious harm that could not be avoided by less restrictive means. 2.8 House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a party to this action.
House Counsel does not include Outside Counsel of Record or any other outside counsel. 2.9 Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
other legal entity not named as a Party to this action. 2.10 Outside Counsel of Record: attorneys who are not employees of a party to
Trucker Huss
this action but are retained to represent or advise a party to this action and have appeared in this action on behalf of that party or are affiliated with a law firm which has appeared on behalf of that party. 2.11 Party: any party to this action, including all of its officers, directors,
employees, consultants, retained experts, and Outside Counsel of Record (and their support staffs). 2.12 Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or
Discovery Material in this action. 2.13 Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support
services (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or demonstrations, and organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium) and their employees and subcontractors. 2.14 Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is designated
as "CONFIDENTIAL," or as "HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY." 2.15 Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material
from a Producing Party.
[PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER; Case No. 10-cv-04478 SBA (LB)
#1159073
3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
A Professional Corporation rd 100 Montgomery Street, 23 Floor San Francisco, California 94104
3.
SCOPE The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only Protected
Material (as defined above), but also (1) any information copied or extracted from Protected Material; (2) all copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations of Protected Material; and (3) any testimony, conversations, or presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might reveal Protected Material. However, the protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order do not cover the following information: (a) any information that is in the public domain at the time of disclosure to a Receiving Party or becomes part of the public domain after its disclosure to a Receiving Party as a result of publication not involving a violation of this Order, including becoming part of the public record through trial or otherwise; and (b) any information known to the Receiving Party prior to the disclosure or obtained by the Receiving Party after the disclosure from a source who obtained the information lawfully and under no obligation of confidentiality to the Designating Party. Any use of Protected Material at trial shall be governed by a separate agreement or order. 4. DURATION Even after final disposition of this litigation, the confidentiality obligations imposed by this Order shall remain in effect until a Designating Party agrees otherwise in writing or a court order otherwise directs. Final disposition shall be deemed to be the later of (1) dismissal of all claims and defenses in this action, with or without prejudice; and (2) final judgment herein after the completion and exhaustion of all appeals, rehearings, remands, trials, or reviews of this action, including the time limits for filing any motions or applications for extension of time pursuant to applicable law. 5. DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL 5.1 Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection. Each
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Trucker Huss
Party or Non-Party that designates information or items for protection under this Order must take care to limit any such designation to specific material that qualifies under the appropriate standards. To the extent it is practical to do so, the Designating Party must designate for protection only those parts of material, documents, items, or oral or written communications that qualify so that other portions of the material, documents, items, or communications for which protection is
[PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER; Case No. 10-cv-04478 SBA (LB)
#1159073
4
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
A Professional Corporation rd 100 Montgomery Street, 23 Floor San Francisco, California 94104
not warranted are not swept unjustifiably within the ambit of this Order. Mass, indiscriminate, or routinized designations are prohibited. Designations that are shown to be clearly unjustified or that have been made for an improper purpose (e.g., to unnecessarily encumber or retard the case development process or to impose unnecessary expenses and burdens on other parties) expose the Designating Party to sanctions. If it comes to a Designating Party's attention that information or items that it designated for protection do not qualify for protection at all or do not qualify for the level of protection initially asserted, that Designating Party must promptly notify all other parties that it is withdrawing the mistaken designation. 5.2 Manner and Timing of Designations. Except as otherwise provided in this
Order (see, e.g., second paragraph of section 5.2(a) below), or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, Disclosure or Discovery Material that qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly so designated before the material is disclosed or produced. Designation in conformity with this Order requires: (a) for information in documentary form (e.g., paper or electronic documents, but excluding transcripts of depositions or other pretrial or trial proceedings), that the Producing Party affix the legend "CONFIDENTIAL" or "HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY" to each page that contains protected material. If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins) and must specify, for each portion, the level of protection being asserted. A Party or Non-Party that makes original documents or materials available for inspection need not designate them for protection until after the inspecting Party has indicated which material it would like copied and produced. During the inspection and before the
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Trucker Huss
designation, all of the material made available for inspection shall be deemed "HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY." After the inspecting Party has identified the documents it wants copied and produced, the Producing Party must determine which documents, or portions thereof, qualify for protection under this Order. Then, before producing the specified
[PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER; Case No. 10-cv-04478 SBA (LB)
#1159073
5
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
A Professional Corporation rd 100 Montgomery Street, 23 Floor San Francisco, California 94104
documents, the Producing Party must affix the appropriate legend ("CONFIDENTIAL" or "HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY") to each page that contains Protected Material. If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins) and must specify, for each portion, the level of protection being asserted. (b) for testimony given in deposition or in other pretrial or trial proceedings, that the Designating Party identify on the record, before the close of the deposition, hearing, or other proceeding, all protected testimony and specify the level of protection being asserted. When it is impractical to identify separately each portion of testimony that is entitled to protection and it appears that substantial portions of the testimony may qualify for protection, the Designating Party may invoke on the record (before the deposition, hearing, or other proceeding is concluded) a right to have up to 21 days to identify the specific portions of the testimony as to which protection is sought and to specify the level of protection being asserted. Only those portions of the testimony that are appropriately designated for protection within the 21 days shall be covered by the provisions of this Stipulated Protective Order. Alternatively, a Designating Party may specify, at the deposition or up to 21 days afterwards if that period is properly invoked, that the entire transcript shall be treated as "CONFIDENTIAL" or "HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY." Parties shall give the other parties notice if they reasonably expect a deposition, hearing or other proceeding to include Protected Material so that the other parties can ensure that only authorized individuals who have signed the "Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound" (Exhibit A) are present at those proceedings. The use of a document as an exhibit at a deposition shall not in any way affect its designation as "CONFIDENTIAL" or "HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY." Transcripts containing Protected Material shall have an obvious legend on the title page that the transcript contains Protected Material, and the title page shall be followed by a list of all pages (including line numbers as appropriate) that have been designated as Protected Material and the level of protection being asserted by the Designating Party. The Designating Party shall
[PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER; Case No. 10-cv-04478 SBA (LB)
#1159073
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Trucker Huss
6
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
A Professional Corporation rd 100 Montgomery Street, 23 Floor San Francisco, California 94104
inform the court reporter of these requirements.
Any transcript that is prepared before the
expiration of a 21-day period for designation shall be treated during that period as if it had been designated "HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY" in its entirety unless otherwise agreed. After the expiration of that period, the transcript shall be treated only as actually designated. (c) for information produced in some form other than documentary and for any other tangible items, that the Producing Party affix in a prominent place on the exterior of the container or containers in which the information or item is stored the legend "CONFIDENTIAL" or "HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY". If only a portion or portions of the information or item warrant protection, the Producing Party, to the extent practicable, shall identify the protected portion(s) and specify the level of protection being asserted. 5.3 Inadvertent Failures to Designate. If timely corrected, an inadvertent failure
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Trucker Huss
to designate qualified information or items does not, standing alone, waive the Designating Party's right to secure protection under this Order for such material. Upon timely correction of a
designation, the Receiving Party must make reasonable efforts to assure that the material is treated in accordance with the provisions of this Order. 6. CHALLENGING CONFIDENTIALITY DESIGNATIONS 6.1 Timing of Challenges. Any Party or Non-Party may challenge a designation
of confidentiality at any time. Unless a prompt challenge to a Designating Party's confidentiality designation is necessary to avoid foreseeable, substantial unfairness, unnecessary economic burdens, or a significant disruption or delay of the litigation, a Party does not waive its right to challenge a confidentiality designation by electing not to mount a challenge promptly after the original designation is disclosed. 6.2 Meet and Confer. The Challenging Party shall initiate the dispute resolution
process by providing written notice of each designation it is challenging and describing the basis for each challenge. To avoid ambiguity as to whether a challenge has been made, the written notice must recite that the challenge to confidentiality is being made in accordance with this specific paragraph of the Protective Order. The parties shall attempt to resolve each challenge in
[PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER; Case No. 10-cv-04478 SBA (LB)
#1159073
7
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
A Professional Corporation rd 100 Montgomery Street, 23 Floor San Francisco, California 94104
good faith and must begin the process by conferring directly (in voice to voice dialogue; other forms of communication are not sufficient) within 14 days of the date of service of notice. In conferring, the Challenging Party must explain the basis for its belief that the confidentiality designation was not proper and must give the Designating Party an opportunity to review the designated material, to reconsider the circumstances, and, if no change in designation is offered, to explain the basis for the chosen designation. A Challenging Party may proceed to the next stage of the challenge process only if it has engaged in this meet and confer process first or establishes that the Designating Party is unwilling to participate in the meet and confer process in a timely manner. 6.3 Judicial Intervention. A Party that elects to press a challenge to a
confidentiality designation after considering the justification offered by the Designating Party may file and serve a motion under Local Rule 7 (and in compliance with Civil Local Rule 79-5, if applicable) that identifies the challenged material and sets forth in detail the basis for the challenge. Each such motion must be accompanied by a competent declaration that affirms that the movant has complied with the meet and confer requirements imposed in the preceding paragraph and that sets forth with specificity the justification for the confidentiality designation that was given by the Designating Party in the meet and confer dialogue. The burden of persuasion in any such
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Trucker Huss
challenge proceeding shall be on the Designating Party. Until the court rules on the challenge, all parties shall continue to afford the material in question the level of protection to which it is entitled under the Producing Party's designation. 7. ACCESS TO AND USE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL 7.1 Basic Principles. A Receiving Party may use Protected Material that is
disclosed or produced by another Party or by a Non-Party in connection with this case only for prosecuting, defending, or attempting to settle this litigation. Such Protected Material may be disclosed only to the categories of persons and under the conditions described in this Order. When the litigation has been terminated, a Receiving Party must comply with the provisions of Section 11 below (FINAL DISPOSITION). Protected Material must be stored and maintained by a Receiving Party at a location and in a secure manner that ensures that access is limited to the persons authorized under this
[PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER; Case No. 10-cv-04478 SBA (LB)
#1159073
8
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
A Professional Corporation rd 100 Montgomery Street, 23 Floor San Francisco, California 94104
Order. 7.2 Disclosure of "CONFIDENTIAL" Information or Items. Unless otherwise
ordered by the court or permitted in writing by the Designating Party, a Receiving Party may disclose any information or item designated "CONFIDENTIAL" only to: (a) the Receiving Party's Outside Counsel of Record in this action, as well as employees of said Outside Counsel of Record to whom it is reasonably necessary to disclose the information for this litigation and who have signed the "Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound" that is attached hereto as Exhibit A; (b) the officers, directors, and employees (including House Counsel) of the
Receiving Party to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have signed the "Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound" (Exhibit A); (c) Experts (as defined in this Order) of the Receiving Party to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have signed the "Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound" (Exhibit A); (d) the court and its personnel; (e) court reporters and their staff, professional jury or trial consultants, and
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Trucker Huss
Professional Vendors to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have signed the "Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound" (Exhibit A); (f) during their depositions, witnesses in the action to whom disclosure is
reasonably necessary and who have signed the "Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound" (Exhibit A), unless otherwise agreed by the Designating Party or ordered by the court. Pages of transcribed deposition testimony or exhibits to depositions that reveal Protected Material must be separately bound by the court reporter and may not be disclosed to anyone except as permitted under this Stipulated Protective Order. (g) the author or recipient of a document containing the information or a custodian or other person who otherwise possessed or knew the information. 7.3 Disclosure of "HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEYS' EYES
ONLY" Information or Items. Unless otherwise ordered by the court or permitted in writing by
[PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER; Case No. 10-cv-04478 SBA (LB)
#1159073
9
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
A Professional Corporation rd 100 Montgomery Street, 23 Floor San Francisco, California 94104
the Designating Party, a Receiving Party may disclose any information or item designated "HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY" only to: (a) the Receiving Party's Outside Counsel of Record in this action, as well as employees of said Outside Counsel of Record to whom it is reasonably necessary to disclose the information for this litigation and who have signed the "Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound" that is attached hereto as Exhibit A; (b) Experts of the Receiving Party (1) to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation, (2) who have signed the "Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound" (Exhibit A), and (3) as to whom the requirements set forth in paragraph 7.4, below, have been met; (c) the court and its personnel; (d) court reporters and their staff, professional jury or trial consultants, and
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Professional Vendors to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have signed the "Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound" (Exhibit A); and (e) the author or recipient of a document containing the information or a custodian or other person who otherwise possessed or knew the information. 7.4 Procedures for Approving or Objecting to Disclosure of "HIGHLY
Trucker Huss
CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY" Information or Items to Experts. (a) "CONFIDENTIAL" or "HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY" information or items may be disclosed to an Expert without disclosure of the identity of the Expert as long as (1) the Expert is not a current officer, director, or employee of a competitor of a Party or anticipated to become one and (2) the Expert is not, has not been at any time in the past five years, and does not anticipate becoming, affiliated with, retained by, or related to any party, witness, attorney, or entity involved with the litigation filed by Randal Destruel, as Trustee of the Mead Clark 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan and other investors in the Carinalli Loan, against K 4 Corporation dba Sonoma Mortgage and Investment Company, Ira William Stone, Shannon R. Foulk, and Does 1-20, in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Sonoma, Case No. SCV 246125 and/or the bankruptcy proceedings of Clement C. and Ann Marie Carinalli,
[PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER; Case No. 10-cv-04478 SBA (LB)
#1159073
10
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
A Professional Corporation rd 100 Montgomery Street, 23 Floor San Francisco, California 94104
United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of California, Santa Rosa Division, Case No. 09-12986. 8. PROTECTED MATERIAL SUBPOENAED OR ORDERED PRODUCED IN
OTHER LITIGATION If a Party is served with a subpoena or a court order issued in other litigation that compels disclosure of any information or items designated in this action as "CONFIDENTIAL" or "HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY" that Party must: (a) promptly notify in writing the Designating Party. Such notification shall
include a copy of the subpoena or court order; (b) promptly notify in writing the party who caused the subpoena or order to issue in the other litigation that some or all of the material covered by the subpoena or order is subject to this Protective Order. Such notification shall include a copy of this Stipulated Protective Order; and (c) cooperate with respect to all reasonable procedures sought to be pursued by the Designating Party whose Protected Material may be affected. The purpose of imposing these duties is to alert the interested parties to the existence of this Protective Order and to afford the Designating Party in this case an opportunity to try to protect its confidentiality interests in the court from which the subpoena or order issued. If the Designating Party timely seeks a protective order, the Party served with the subpoena or court order shall not produce any information designated in this action as "CONFIDENTIAL" or "HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY" before a determination by the court from which the subpoena or order issued, unless the Party has obtained the Designating Party's permission. The Designating Party shall bear the burden and expense of seeking protection in that court of its confidential material and nothing in these provisions should be construed as authorizing or encouraging a Receiving Party in this action to disobey a lawful directive from another court. 9. UNAUTHORIZED DISCLOSURE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL If a Receiving Party learns that, by inadvertence or otherwise, it has disclosed
[PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER; Case No. 10-cv-04478 SBA (LB)
#1159073
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Trucker Huss
11
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
A Professional Corporation rd 100 Montgomery Street, 23 Floor San Francisco, California 94104
Protected Material to any person or in any circumstance not authorized under this Stipulated Protective Order, the Receiving Party must immediately (a) notify in writing the Designating Party of the unauthorized disclosures, (b) use its best efforts to retrieve all unauthorized copies of the Protected Material, (c) inform the person or persons to whom unauthorized disclosures were made of all the terms of this Order, and (d) request such person or persons to execute the "Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound" that is attached hereto as Exhibit A. 10. MISCELLANEOUS 10.1 Right to Further Relief. Nothing in this Order abridges the right of any
person to seek its modification by the court in the future. 10.2 Right to Assert Other Objections. By stipulating to the entry of this
Protective Order no Party waives any right it otherwise would have to object to disclosing or producing any information or item on any ground not addressed in this Stipulated Protective Order. Similarly, no Party waives any right to object on any ground to use in evidence of any of the material covered by this Protective Order. 10.3 Filing Protected Material. Without written permission from the Designating
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Trucker Huss
Party or a court order secured after appropriate notice to all interested persons, a Party may not file in the public record in this action any Protected Material. A Party that seeks to file under seal any Protected Material must comply with Civil Local Rule 79-5. Protected Material may only be filed under seal pursuant to a court order authorizing the sealing of the specific Protected Material at issue. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5, a sealing order will issue only upon a request establishing that the Protected Material at issue is privileged, protectable as a trade secret, or otherwise entitled to protection under the law. If a Receiving Party's request to file Protected Material under seal pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5(d) is denied by the court, then the Receiving Party may file the Protected Material in the public record pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5(e) unless otherwise instructed by the court. 11. FINAL DISPOSITION Within 90 days after the final disposition of this action, as defined in paragraph 4, each Receiving Party must return all Protected Material to the Producing Party or destroy such
[PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER; Case No. 10-cv-04478 SBA (LB)
#1159073
12
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
A Professional Corporation rd 100 Montgomery Street, 23 Floor San Francisco, California 94104
material. As used in this subdivision, "all Protected Material" includes all copies, abstracts, compilations, summaries, and any other format reproducing or capturing any of the Protected Material. Whether the Protected Material is returned or destroyed, the Receiving Party must submit a written certification to the Producing Party (and, if not the same person or entity, to the Designating Party) by the 90 day deadline that (1) identifies (by category, where appropriate) all the Protected Material that was returned or destroyed and (2) affirms that the Receiving Party has not retained any copies, abstracts, compilations, summaries or any other format reproducing or capturing any of the Protected Material. Notwithstanding this provision, Counsel are entitled to retain an archival copy of all pleadings, motion papers, trial, deposition, and hearing transcripts, legal memoranda, correspondence, deposition and trial exhibits, expert reports, attorney work product, and consultant and expert work product, even if such materials contain Protected Material. Any such archival copies that contain or constitute Protected Material remain subject to this Protective Order as set forth in Section 4 (DURATION). IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD. Respectfully submitted, Dated: March 29, 2011 By: Dated: March 29, 2011 By: LEWIS, FEINBERG, LEE, RENAKER & JACKSON, P.C. /s/Julie Wilensky Julie Wilensky NARDELL CHITSAZ & ASSOCIATES LLP /s/J. Timothy Nardell J. Timothy Nardell Attorneys for Plaintiffs Dated: March 29, 2011 By: TRUCKER HUSS APC /s/Virginia H. Perkins Virginia H. Perkins Attorneys for Defendants
UNIT ED
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Trucker Huss
IT IS SO ORDERED.
S
S DISTRICT TE C TA
Honorable BEELER Armstrong LAUREL Sandra B. Judge, United Magistrate Judge United States States District Court
ER
N
F D IS T IC T O R
A
C
LI
FO
urel Judge La
Beeler
R NIA
Dated:
April 6, 2011
IT IS SO
ORDER
ED
RT U O
[PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER; Case No. 10-cv-04478 SBA (LB)
#1159073
NO
RT
H
13
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
A Professional Corporation rd 100 Montgomery Street, 23 Floor San Francisco, California 94104
EXHIBIT A ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND AGREEMENT TO BE BOUND I, [print or type full name], of [print or type full address] declare under penalty of perjury that I have read in its entirety and understand the Stipulated Protective Order that was issued by the United States District Court for the Northern District of California on [date] in the case of Orsolini v. Mead Clark Lumber Co. et al., Case No. 10-cv-04478 SBA, I agree to comply with and to be bound by all the terms of this Stipulated Protective Order and I understand and acknowledge that failure to so comply could expose me to sanctions and punishment in the nature of contempt. I solemnly promise that I will not disclose in any manner any information or item that is subject to this Stipulated Protective Order to any person or entity except in strict compliance with the provisions of this Order. I further agree to submit to the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California for the purpose of enforcing the terms of this Stipulated Protective Order, even if such enforcement proceedings occur after termination of this action. I hereby appoint [print or type full name] of
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Trucker Huss
[print or type full address and telephone number] as my California agent for service of process in connection with this action or any proceedings related to enforcement of this Stipulated Protective Order. Date: City and State where sworn and signed: Printed name: Signature:
[PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER; Case No. 10-cv-04478 SBA (LB)
#1159073
14
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?