Orsolini et al v. Mead Clark Lumber Co. et al

Filing 33

ORDER re 31 Proposed Order filed by Andrew Levine, Mario L. Orsolini. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 10/13/11. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/13/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

TERESA S. RENAKER (State Bar #187800)
LINDSAY NAKO (State Bar #239090)
JULIE WILENSKY (State Bar #271765)
LEWIS, FEINBERG, LEE, RENAKER & JACKSON, P.C.
476 9th Street
Oakland, CA 94607
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
J. TIMOTHY NARDELL (State Bar #184444)
NARDELL CHITSAZ & ASSOCIATES LLP
790 Mission Avenue
San Rafael, California 94901
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs MARIO L. ORSOLINI and
ANDREW M. LEVINE

12
13
14

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

15

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

16

OAKLAND DIVISION

17
18
19

MARIO L. ORSOLINI and ANDREW M.
LEVINE,
Plaintiffs,

20
21
22
23
24

Case No. C-10-04478 SBA
ORDER APPROVING CLASS NOTICE
AND REQUIRING DISTRIBUTION TO
CLASS MEMBERS

vs.
MEAD CLARK LUMBER CO. AKA
MEAD CLARK LUMBER COMPANY,
INC., and RANDAL J. DESTRUEL,
Defendants.

25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER APPROVING CLASS NOTICE AND REQUIRING DISTRIBUTION TO CLASS MEMBERS
CASE NO. C-10-04478 SBA

1

1
2

Based on the Order Certifying Class Action entered by this Court on June 14, 2011 (Docket
No. 30),

3

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

4

1.

The Court approves Class Notice substantially conforming to the Class Notice

5

prepared by Plaintiffs Mario L. Orsolini and Andrew M. Levine, and filed as Exhibit A hereto, as the

6

best notice that is practicable under the circumstances.

7

2.

Within five (5) business days following the entry of this Order, Defendants

8

Mead Clark Lumber Co. AKA Mead Clark Lumber Company, Inc., and Randal J. Destruel will

9

provide directly to Class Counsel a list (in electronic form) containing the names and last known

10

addresses of all individuals who may potentially be Class Members.

11

3.

Within fourteen (14) days after the receipt of such information, Class Counsel

12

will ensure that notices substantially conforming to the Class Notice prepared by Plaintiffs and filed

13

as Exhibit A hereto have been mailed to all potential Class Members.

14
15

4.

The cost of preparing and mailing the Class Notice will be borne by the Named

Plaintiffs.

16
17
18

Dated: 10/13/11

_______________________________
Honorable Saundra Brown Armstrong
United States District Court Judge
Northern District of California

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER APPROVING CLASS NOTICE AND REQUIRING DISTRIBUTION TO CLASS MEMBERS
CASE NO. C-10-04478 SBA

2