Orsolini et al v. Mead Clark Lumber Co. et al

Filing 50

FINAL JUDGMENT entered in accordance with the Order Granting Final Approval of Class Action Settlement; Attorneys' Fees, Costs, and Incentive Awards to named Plaintiff. Signed by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong, on 8/13/12. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/13/2012) Modified on 8/13/2012 (jlm, COURT STAFF).

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

TERESA S. RENAKER (State Bar #187800)
LINDSAY NAKO (State Bar #239090)
JULIE WILENSKY (State Bar #271765)
LEWIS, FEINBERG, LEE, RENAKER & JACKSON, P.C.
476 9th Street
Oakland, CA 94607
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
J. TIMOTHY NARDELL (State Bar #184444)
NARDELL CHITSAZ & ASSOCIATES LLP
790 Mission Avenue
San Rafael, California 94901
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs and the Class

13
14

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

15

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

16

OAKLAND DIVISION

17
18
19

MARIO L. ORSOLINI and ANDREW M.
LEVINE,

[PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT
Plaintiffs,

20
21

vs.

23

MEAD CLARK LUMBER CO. AKA
MEAD CLARK LUMBER COMPANY,
INC., and RANDAL J. DESTRUEL,

24

Defendants.

22

25
26
27
28

Case No. C-10-04478 SBA

1
2

[PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT
Pursuant to the Court’s July 25, 2012 Order Granting Final Approval of Class Action

3

Settlement; Attorneys’ Fees, Costs, and Incentive Awards to Named Plaintiffs; and Entry of Final

4

Judgment (Dkt. 48), and Order Granting Plaintiffs’ Motion for Attorneys’ Fees, Costs, and Incentive

5

Awards for Named Plaintiffs (Dkt. 47), it is hereby ordered that judgment in this matter is entered in

6

accordance with the Order Granting Final Approval of Class Action Settlement; Attorneys’ Fees, Costs,

7

and Incentive Awards to Named Plaintiffs; and Entry of Final Judgment, and the Parties’ Stipulation

8

and Agreement of Settlement.

9

The above-captioned action is dismissed with prejudice.

10
11

IT IS SO ORDERED.

12
13

Dated: 8/13/1

14
Hon. Saundra B. Armstrong
United States District Judge

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT
CASE NO. C-10-04478 SBA

1