Adlao et al v. JPMorgan Chase & Co et al
Filing
45
ORDER, Set/Reset Deadlines as to 43 MOTION to Certify Class. Responses due by 4/29/2011. Replies due by 5/6/2011.. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 4/12/11. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/13/2011)
1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
OAKLAND DIVISION
5
MARY ANN ADLAO and MARY
Case No: C 10-4508 SBA
6 WILLIAMS, individually and on behalf of all
others similarly situated, and on behalf of the
7 general public,
Plaintiffs,
8
9
ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING
SCHEDULE
vs.
10 JPMORGAN CHASE & CO., JPMORGAN
CHASE BANK, N.A., and EMC
11 MORTGAGE CORP., as successors in
interest to BEAR STEARNS, INC., and
12 ENCORE CREDIT CORP., and Does 1-59,
inclusive,
13
Defendants.
14
15
16
This matter is scheduled for hearing on June 21, 2011, for Plaintiffs’ Motion and
17
Motion for Conditional Certification and Court-Authorized Notice Pursuant to 29 U.S.C.
18
§ 216(B), and for Equitable Tolling. Dkt. 43. To expedite matters, the Court revises the
19
briefing schedule specified in Civil Local Rule 7-3 as follows:
20
1.
Any opposition to the motion shall be filed by no than April 29, 2011. The
21
failure to timely file an opposition may be construed as a consent to the granting of the
22
motion.
23
2.
Any reply shall be filed by no later than May 6, 2011.
24
3.
The Court, in its discretion, may decide the motion without oral argument,
25
pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78(b), in which case no appearance for the motion
26
or Case Management Conference will be necessary. The parties are advised to check the
27
Court’s website to determine whether a court appearance is required.
28
1
2
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 12, 2011
_______________________________
SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG
United States District Judge
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?