Roberson v. St. Anthony Foundation

Filing 55

ORDER CONDITIONALLY DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 1/25/12. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/25/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 6 7 DUANE ROBERSON, Plaintiff, vs. ST. ANTHONY FOUNDATION, 8 Defendant. 9 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. C10-04576 SBA ORDER DISMISSING ACTION 10 11 The Court having been notified of the settlement of 12 this action, and it appearing that no issue remains for the 13 Court's determination, 14 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT this action and all claims 15 asserted herein are DISMISSED with prejudice. 16 that the settlement is not reached, any party may move to 17 reopen the case and the trial will be rescheduled, provided 18 that such motion is filed within 60 days of this order. 19 scheduled dates, including the trial and pretrial dates, are 20 VACATED. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 In the event IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: 1/25/12 SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG United States District Judge All 1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 DUANE ROBERSON, 5 Plaintiff, 6 7 8 Case Number: CV10-04576 SBA CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE v. ST. ANTHONY FOUNDATION et al, Defendant. / 9 10 11 12 13 I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. That on January 25, 2012, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office. 14 15 16 17 18 19 Duane Roberson 1912 Ward Street Berkeley, CA 94703 Dated: January 25, 2012 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk By: LISA R CLARK, Deputy Clerk 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?