Roberson v. St. Anthony Foundation
Filing
55
ORDER CONDITIONALLY DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 1/25/12. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/25/2012)
1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
5
6
7
DUANE ROBERSON,
Plaintiff,
vs.
ST. ANTHONY FOUNDATION,
8
Defendant.
9
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. C10-04576 SBA
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION
10
11
The Court having been notified of the settlement of
12
this action, and it appearing that no issue remains for the
13
Court's determination,
14
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT this action and all claims
15
asserted herein are DISMISSED with prejudice.
16
that the settlement is not reached, any party may move to
17
reopen the case and the trial will be rescheduled, provided
18
that such motion is filed within 60 days of this order.
19
scheduled dates, including the trial and pretrial dates, are
20
VACATED.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
In the event
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: 1/25/12
SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG
United States District Judge
All
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
DUANE ROBERSON,
5
Plaintiff,
6
7
8
Case Number: CV10-04576 SBA
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
v.
ST. ANTHONY FOUNDATION et al,
Defendant.
/
9
10
11
12
13
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S.
District Court, Northern District of California.
That on January 25, 2012, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing
said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by
depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office
delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office.
14
15
16
17
18
19
Duane Roberson
1912 Ward Street
Berkeley, CA 94703
Dated: January 25, 2012
Richard W. Wieking, Clerk
By: LISA R CLARK, Deputy Clerk
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?