Taylor et al v. Honeywell International Inc

Filing 56

ORDER by Judge ARMSTRONG granting 49 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/4/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

OAKLAND DIVISION

11

MARK LEE TAYLOR and PAMELA TAYLOR,

12
13
14
15

Plaintiffs,
v.
HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC., and
DOES 1-100,
Defendants.

16
17

Case No. 10-cv-04659 SBA
Consolidated with
Case No. 10-cv-01920 SBA
XXXXXXXXXORDER GRANTING
[PROPOSED]
PLAINTIFFS’ ADMINISTRATIVE
MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS
UNDER SEAL

Hon. Saundra B. Armstrong

18
19

MARK LEE TAYLOR and PAMELA TAYLOR,
Plaintiffs,

20
21
22
23

v.
JEPPESEN DATAPLAN, INC., JEPPESEN
SANDERSON, INC. and DOES 1-100,
Defendants.

24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO SEAL
CASE NO. 10-CV-04659 SBA
SD-572900

1

On October 26, 2011, plaintiffs Mark and Pamela Taylor (“Plaintiffs”) filed an

2

Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Designated Deposition Testimony Related to Plaintiffs’

3

Opposition to Defendant Honeywell International Inc.’s (“Honeywell”) Motion for Summary

4

Judgment.

5
6

On November 2, 2011, Honeywell filed the Declaration of William D. Janicki in support of
Plaintiffs’ Administrative Motion with regard to Exhibits 5 and 6.

7

Having reviewed Plaintiffs’ Administrative Motion and the Declaration of William D.

8

Janicki in Support thereof, this Court finds good cause to seal Exhibits 5 and 6 of Plaintiffs’

9

Opposition to Honeywell’s Motion for Summary Judgment.

10

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

11

Any redacted or unredacted versions of Plaintiffs’ Exhibits 5 and 6 in opposition to

12

Honeywell’s Motion for Summary Judgment, and currently lodged with the Court, shall be filed

13

under seal and shall not become part of the public record.

14
15

Dated:

11/3/11

U.S. District Court Judge

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO SEAL
CASE NO. 10-CV-04659 SBA
SD-572900

1