Smith v. Astrue
Filing
37
Order by Hon. Phyllis J. Hamilton granting 35 Motion for Attorney Fees.(pjhlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/20/2014)
1
2
3
4
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
CLIFFORD O. SMITH II,
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
No. C 10-4814 PJH
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR
AWARD OF ATTORNEY’S FEES
v.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting
Commissioner, Social Security
Administration,
Defendant.
/
13
14
Harvey Sackett, counsel for plaintiff Clifford O. Smith, applies for an award of
15
attorney’s fees and costs pursuant to the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)(1)(A).
16
Defendant Carolyn W. Colvin does not oppose the fee application. Having reviewed the
17
papers and considered the relevant authority, the court GRANTS Sackett’s application for a
18
net award of fees in the amount of $2,886.19, as set forth below.
19
Plaintiff entered a contingent fee agreement with Sackett for 25% of past due
20
benefits if he received a favorable decision at any time following an unfavorable or partially
21
unfavorable administrative law judge decision either at any administrative level or at the
22
judicial level. Mot., Ex. C. (doc. no. 35-5). Plaintiff commenced the instant action to appeal
23
an unfavorable decision by an administrative law judge, denying his applications for Social
24
Security benefits. By order entered March 26, 2012, the court remanded the matter for
25
further administrative proceedings. By order entered July 31, 2012, the court granted in
26
part plaintiff’s motion for attorney’s fees and costs pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice
27
Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), ordering an award in the amount of $7,084.31. Upon
28
remand, the administrative law judge issued a favorable decision on March 5, 2013. Mot.,
1
Ex. A (doc. no. 35-3). Plaintiff was awarded past due benefits in the amount of $70,882.00.
2
Mot., Ex. B (doc. no. 35-4).
3
Sackett seeks an award of $9,970.50 pursuant to the contingent fee agreement,
record, the court finds that $9,970.50 is a reasonable fee for the services rendered,
6
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). See Gisbrecht v. Barnhart, 535 U.S. 789, 807-08 (2002).
7
Sackett further requests that plaintiff be credited in the amount of $7,084.31 toward the fee
8
award as a result of the EAJA fees awarded by the court. Id. at 796 (fees may be awarded
9
both as payable by the government under EAJA and as fees payable under § 406(b) out of
10
the claimant's past-due Social Security benefits, “but the claimant's attorney must ‘refund to
11
For the Northern District of California
which falls within the statutory maximum of 25% of in past-due benefits. In light of the
5
United States District Court
4
the claimant the amount of the smaller fee’”) (quoting Act of Aug. 5, 1985, Pub. L. 99–80, §
12
3, 99 Stat. 186). Thus, the resulting net fee due to Sackett is the amount of $2,886.19.
13
For the reasons set forth above, the fee application is GRANTED. The court awards
14
Sackett fees pursuant to § 406(b)(1)(A) in the amount of $9,970.50, which is offset by the
15
EAJA fee award of $7,084.31, for a net fee award of $2,886.19, which is payable to Sackett
16
out of the amount of the past-due benefits.
17
IT IS SO ORDERED.
18
19
Dated: February 19, 2014
20
Phyllis J. Hamilton
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?