Athena Feminine Technologies Inc. v. Wilkes et al

Filing 124

STIPULATION AND ORDER, Motions terminated: 121 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 117 Order on Stipulation,, filed by Athena Feminine Technologies Inc., Pelfit Technologies LLC, Morton Cordell, Derek Wilkes, Silk Road Associates LLC. Case Management Conference set for 3/14/2013 10:00 AM. Claims Construction Hearing set for 3/14/2013 10:00 AM.. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 11/13/12. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/14/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 Steven C. Finley CSB# 074391 HENNEFER, FINLEY & WOOD, LLP 425 California Street, 19th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 296-0111 Facsimile: (415) 296-7111 Email: SFinley@finleylaw.biz Attorneys for Plaintiff Athena Feminine Technologies, Inc. 5 6 7 8 Christopher Sargent, CSB # 246285 COMPUTERLAW GROUP LLP 401 Florence Street Palo Alto, CA 94301 Telephone: (650) 327-9800 Facsimile: (650) 618-1863 Email: CSargent@computerlaw.com 10 Attorneys for Defendants Derek Wilkes, Pelfit Technologies, LLC, Morton Cordell, and Silk Road Associates, LLC 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 ATTORNEYS AT LAW HENNEFER FINLEY & WOOD, LLP 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 14 15 ATHENA FEMININE TECHNOLOGIES INC. STIPULATION AND ORDER RESETTING DEADLINES FOR CLAIM CONSTRUCTION HEARING 16 Plaintiff, 17 18 19 20 21 22 Case No.: CV-10-4868-SBA vs. DEREK WILKES, PELFIT TECHNOLOGIES LLC, MORTON CORDELL, SILK ROAD ASSOCIATES LLC, SIMON FAN, and KING CHAMPION (HONG KONG) LTD. Defendants. 23 24 25 26 27 28 -1STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RESETTING DEADLINES FOR CLAIM CONSTRUCTION HEARING 1 WHEREAS: 2 A. 3 The parties hereto have previously entered into a Stipulation, which the court has entered as an Order on August 28, 2012 (Docket 117), setting deadlines for a Claim 4 Construction Hearing in this action; 5 6 B. The parties have, in accordance with the Order, disclosed asserted claims and 7 infringement contentions by July 30, 2012, invalidity contentions by September 27, 8 2012, and listed claim terms to be construed by the court by October 15, 2012; C. 10 At the same time, the parties have been engaged in continued settlement discussions following an August 24, 2012 Settlement Conference with Honorable 11 Donna Ryu, which discussions are continuing; 12 ATTORNEYS AT LAW HENNEFER FINLEY & WOOD, LLP 9 13 D. Prior to or on October 15, 2012, plaintiff listed three claim terms for construction 14 pursuant to claim 1 of its patent, and defendants listed 32 claim terms for 15 construction pursuant to claims 1-21 of plaintiff’s patent (approximately 7 of which 16 are repeated within two or more claims); and 17 E. In order to allow additional time for exchange of proposed construction of 18 identified terms, and the filing of a Joint Claim Construction Statement, and to 19 20 21 22 23 24 allow additional time for settlement discussions which may obviate the need for the Claim Construction Hearing: THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE, subject to obtaining the permission and consent of the court, through their respective counsel, to extend the current outstanding deadlines in the court’s August 28, 2012 Order by a period of approximately twenty-eight (28) days and the Claim 25 Construction Hearing by fourteen (14) days. Accordingly, the parties request the court to extend 26 27 28 the deadlines for the parties remaining obligations under the Patent Local Rules as follows: -2STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RESETTING DEADLINES FOR CLAIM CONSTRUCTION HEARING 1 4. Exchange of Proposed Constructions of Identified Terms (LR4-2) 2 3 to be served by: December 3, 2012 5. Joint Claim Construction Statement (LR4-3) to be served by: December 10, 2012 6. Opening Briefs and Evidence to be filed and served by: January 7, 2013 6 7. Opposition Brief and Evidence to be filed and served by: January 21, 2013 7 8. Reply Brief to be filed and served by: February 8, 2013 9. Claim Construction Hearing to be held on or after: March 10, 2013 4 5 8 10 IT IS SO STIPULATED: 11 12 ATTORNEYS AT LAW HENNEFER FINLEY & WOOD, LLP 9 13 Dated: HENNEFER, FINLEY & WOOD, LLP 14 /s/ Steven C. Finley Steven C. Finley, Attorney for Plaintiff Athena Feminine Technologies Inc. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Dated: COMPUTERLAW GROUP LLP /s/ Christopher Sargent Christopher Sargent, Attorney for Defendants Derek Wilkes, Pelfit Technologies, LLC, Morton Cordell, and Silk Road Associates, LLC 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RESETTING DEADLINES FOR CLAIM CONSTRUCTION HEARING 1 2 3 [PROPOSED] ORDER The parties shall appear for a claim construction hearing on March 14, 2013 at 10:00 AM. Two (2) hours is allotted for the hearing, inclusive of any tutorial. Immediately following the 4 claims construction hearing, the Court will conduct a Case Management Conference in the 5 6 courtroom. Prior to the date scheduled for the conference, the parties shall meet and confer and prepare a joint Case Management Conference Statement which complies with the Standing Order 8 for All Judges of the Northern District of California and the Standing Orders of this Court. 9 Plaintiff shall assume responsibility for filing the joint statement no less than seven (7) days prior 10 to the conference date. This Order terminates Docket 117. 11 12 ATTORNEYS AT LAW HENNEFER FINLEY & WOOD, LLP 7 13 14 Dated: 11/13/12 Hon. Saundra Brown Armstrong United States District Judge 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -4STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RESETTING DEADLINES FOR CLAIM CONSTRUCTION HEARING

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?