Graham-Sult et al v. Clainos et al

Filing 169

ORDER STAYING EXECUTION OF 142 JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 4/1/2013. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/1/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 7 ALEXANDER GRAHAM-SULT and DAVID GRAHAM, 8 Plaintiffs, 9 13 v. NICHOLAS P. CLAINOS, RICHARD L. GREENE, LINDA McCALL, GREENE RADOVSKY MALONEY SHARE & HENNIGH LLP, BILL GRAHAM ARCHIVES LLC, d/b/a WOLFGANG’S VAULT, NORTON LLC and WILLIAM E. SAGAN, 14 Defendants. United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 No. C 10-4877 CW ORDER STAYING EXECUTION OF JUDGMENT 15 16 ________________________________/ 17 18 In its March 21, 2013 order, the Court conditionally granted 19 Plaintiffs Alexander Graham-Sult and David Graham’s motion to stay 20 execution of the fee award. 21 be granted upon notice to the Court that Plaintiffs had posted a 22 supersedeas bond in the amount of $750,000. 23 Plaintiffs filed a notice of posting supersedeas bond on appeal. 24 A copy of the bond in the amount of $750,000 was attached to the 25 notice, and Plaintiffs indicate that the original bond is on file 26 with the Clerk of this Court. 27 28 The Court ordered that the stay would On March 27, 2013, Accordingly, the Court stays enforcement of its order dated March 23, 2012 granting Defendants’ motions for attorneys’ fees 1 and costs. (Docket No. 142). The stay is effective as of this 2 date and shall remain in effect during the pendency of the appeal 3 of the attorneys’ fees award (Ninth Circuit Docket No. 12-15892). 4 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 8 9 Dated: 4/1/2013 CLAUDIA WILKEN United States District Judge United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?