Shepherd v. Stolc
Filing
4
ORDER by Judge ARMSTRONG granting 3 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/25/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
OAKLAND DIVISION
11
12
TAYLOR ROY SHEPHERD,
Case No. C 10-04906 SBA (PR)
13
Petitioner, [PROPOSED] ORDER
14
v.
15
16
BRUNO STOLC, Warden,
17
Respondent.
18
19
On motion or respondent and good cause appearing, it is ordered that the time for filing a
20
response to the petition for writ of habeas corpus be, and the same is, extended 60 days to and
21
including July 26, 2011. Petitioner’s reply, if any, shall be filed and served within 60 days or
22
receipt of the answer or motion.
23
24
Dated: 5/24/11
_______________________________
The Honorable Saundra B. Armstrong
United States District Judge
25
26
27
28
1
[Proposed] Order (Shepherd v. Stolc - C 10-04906 SBA (PR))
1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
TAYLOR ROY SHEPHERD,
4
Plaintiff,
5
v.
6
BRUNO STOLC et al,
7
Defendant.
/
8
9
Case Number: CV10-04906 SBA
10
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
11
12
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District
Court, Northern District of California.
13
14
15
That on May 25, 2011, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said
copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing
said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery
receptacle located in the Clerk's office.
16
17
19
Taylor Roy Shepherd F-18739
Red Rock Correctional Center
1752 East Arica Road
Eloy, AZ 85131
20
Dated: May 25, 2011
18
21
Richard W. Wieking, Clerk
By: LISA R CLARK, Deputy Clerk
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
[Proposed] Order (Shepherd v. Stolc - C 10-04906 SBA (PR))
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?