Helton et al v. Factor 5, Inc. et al
Filing
46
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 43 Stipulation filed by Chad Lowe, Alisha Piccirillo, Jesse Helton. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 10/28/11. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/31/2011)
Case4:10-cv-04927-SBA Document43
1
2
3
4
5
6
-814-0405 (t) 415-217-7011 (f)
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Filed10/27/11 Page1 of 3
James Smith (SBN 190050)
Damien P. Lillis (SBN 191258)
Martin L. Pitha (SBN 192447)
SMITH LILLIS PITHA LLP
400 Montgomery Street, Suite 501
San Francisco, California 94104
Telephone: (415) 814-0405
Facsimile: (415) 217-7011
jsmith@slplawfirm.com
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
JESSE HELTON, ALISHA PICCIRILLO,
CHAD LOWE, individually and on behalf
of all others similarly situated
Malcolm Leader-Picone
BARTLETT, LEADER-PICONE &
YOUNG LLP
2201 Broadway, Suite 803
Oakland, CA 94612
Telephone: (510) 444-2404
Facsimile: (510) 444-1291
Attorneys for Defendants
JULIAN EGGEBRECHT, HOLGER SCHMIDT
and THOMAS ENGEL
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
400 Montgomery Street, Suite 501
15
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
17
18
JESSE HELTON; ALISHA PICCIRILLO;
CHAD LOWE; individually and on behalf
of all others similarly situated,
19
20
21
22
23
24
Case No. 4:10-cv-4927 SBA
STIPULATION AND XXXXXXXXX
[PROPOSED]
ORDER FOR SCHEDULING
MATTERS RELATED TO
INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS’
MOTION FOR SUMMARY
ADJUDICATION
Plaintiffs,
v.
FACTOR 5, INC.; FACTOR 5, LLC;
BLUHARVEST, LLC; WHITEHARVEST,
LLC; JULIAN EGGEBRECHT; HOLGER
SCHMIDT; THOMAS ENGEL; and DOES
1-100,
Defendants.
25
26
27
28
Plaintiffs Jesse Helton, Alisha Piccirillo, and Chad Lowe (“Plaintiffs” ) and Defendants
Julian Eggebrecht, Holger Schmidt, and Thomas Engel (“Individual Defendants”) hereby
1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND RELATED MATTERS
Case4:10-cv-04927-SBA Document43
Filed10/27/11 Page2 of 3
1
jointly apply, by way of stipulation, for an Order concerning a briefing schedule for the
2
Individual Defendants’ recently filed Motion for Summary Adjudication and related scheduling
3
issues.
The Individual Defendants filed their Motion for Summary Adjudication on October 20,
5
2011. Plaintiffs served the Individual Defendants with deposition notices for October 31, 2011
6
through November 2, 2011. The Individual Defendants and their counsel have indicated they
7
-814-0405 (t) 415-217-7011 (f)
4
are unavailable for deposition until December 13, 2011.
8
Adjudication is scheduled for a hearing on March 6, 2012. Plaintiffs’ opposition to the motion
9
is currently scheduled for November 4, 2011.
10
11
The Motion for Summary
It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the parties, through their respective
attorneys of record, as follows:
12
1.
13
The Individual Defendants will make themselves available for depositions
on December 13, 14, and 15, 2011, commencing at 9:00 a.m.
2.
Per FRCP 30(d)(2) the deposition shall be limited to seven hours.
15
400 Montgomery Street, Suite 501
14
3.
Current deadlines for the Individual Defendants’ Motion for Summary
16
Adjudication are vacated.
17
4.
18
Adjudication shall be filed and served no later than January 9, 2012.
19
5.
20
21
22
Plaintiffs’ Opposition to the Individual Defendants’ Motion for Summary
The Individual Defendants’ Reply papers shall be filed and served no later
than January 24, 2012.
The parties to this stipulation believe that good cause exists and agree to this briefing and
deposition schedule.
23
\\\
24
\\\
25
\\\
26
\\\
27
\\\
28
\\\
2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND RELATED MATTERS
Case4:10-cv-04927-SBA Document43
1
Filed10/27/11 Page3 of 3
IT IS SO STIPULATED:
2
3
Dated: October 27, 2011
SMITH LILLIS PITHA LLP
4
5
By:
6
/s/
JAMES SMITH
-814-0405 (t) 415-217-7011 (f)
7
8
Dated: October 27, 2011
BARTLETT, LEADER-PICONE & YOUNG
9
10
By:
11
/s/
MALCOLM LEADER-PICONE
12
13
14
IT IS SO ORDERED
400 Montgomery Street, Suite 501
15
16
17
18
28
Dated: October ___, 2011
SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND RELATED MATTERS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?