eBay Inc. et al v. PartsRiver, Inc.

Filing 188

ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken DENYING ( 186 in case 4:10-cv-04947-CW and 533 in case 4:11-cv-01548-CW)MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM NONDISPOSITIVE ORDER OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/26/2013)

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

3
4
5

EBAY INC.; and MICROSOFT
CORPORATION,

v.

8

KELORA SYSTEMS, LLC,

9

Defendant.
/

10
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

ORDER DENYING
MOTION FOR RELIEF
FROM
NONDISPOSITIVE
ORDER OF
MAGISTRATE JUDGE
(Docket Nos. 186
in 10-4947 and 533
in 11-1548)

Plaintiffs,

6
7

No. C 10-4947 CW

11
12

No. C 11-1548 CW

KELORA SYSTEMS, LLC,
Plaintiff,

13

v.

16

TARGET CORPORATION; AMAZON.COM,
INC.; DELL, INC.; OFFICE DEPOT,
INC.; NEWEGG INC.; COSTCO
WHOLESALE CORPORATION; HEWLETTPACKARD COMPANY; AUDIBLE, INC.;
and ZAPPOS.COM, INC.,

17

Defendants.

14
15

18
19

/
AND ALL RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS
/

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Movants eBay, Inc., Amazon.com, Inc., Audible, Inc. and
Zappos.com, Inc. seek relief from the Magistrate Judge’s April 5,
2013 order taxing costs pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 72(a) and Local Rule 72-2.
Having considered the papers filed by Movants, the Court
DENIES their motion (Docket Nos. 186 in 10-4947 and 533 in 111548).

The motion was filed seventeen days after service of the

Magistrate Judge’s order and was thus untimely.

See Fed. R. Civ.

1

P. 72 (a) (providing that a party may serve and file objections to

2

a nondispositive order of a magistrate judge within fourteen days

3

of being served with a copy of the order).

4

Magistrate Judge’s rulings are not clearly erroneous or contrary

5

to law.

6

In addition, the

See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A); Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 72(a).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

7
8
9

Dated: 4/26/2013

CLAUDIA WILKEN
United States District Judge

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2