Spansion Inc. v. Tessera Inc.
Filing
14
ORDER Granting 13 Stipulation CHANGING THE DATE OF UPCOMING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND RELATED DATES. Case Management Statement due by 11/1/2011. Case Management Conference set for 11/8/2011 02:00 PM. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 5/25/2011. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/25/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Michael J. Bettinger (State Bar No. 122196)
Timothy P. Walker (State Bar No. 105001)
Elaine Y. Chow (State Bar No. 194063)
Stephen M. Everett (State Bar No. 121619)
K&L GATES LLP
Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 1200
San Francisco, CA 94111
Phone: (415) 882-8200
Fax: (415) 882-8220
mike.bettinger@klgates.com
timothy.walker@klgates.com
elaine.chow@klgates.com
stephen.everett@klgates.com
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
SPANSION, INC. AND SPANSION LLC
10
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
OAKLAND DIVISION
14
15
SPANSION, INC. et al,
CASE NO. 4:10-cv-04954-CW
16
Plaintiffs
17
v.
18
TESSERA, INC.,
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER
CHANGING THE DATE OF UPCOMING
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
AND RELATED DATES
19
Claimant.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CHANGING THE DATE
CASE NO. 4:10-cv-04954-CW
OF UPCOMING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND RELATED DATES
Error! Bookmark not defined.
1
1.
WHEREAS, this Court stayed the case known as Tessera, Inc. v. Advanced Micro
2
Devices, Inc. et al, Case No. C 05-04063 (CW) (the “AMD case”) by its order of May 24, 2007
3
with respect to International Trade Commission Investigation 337-TA-605 “until the
4
determination of the ITC, including appeals becomes final,” and WHEREAS, on August 5, 2008
5
the Court ordered that the stay of the AMD case “shall be extended until a determination in the
6
International Trade Commission Investigation 337-TA-649, including appeals, becomes final;”
7
and
8
9
2.
WHEREAS, this Court issued a Related Case Order on September 11, 2008 in the
AMD case finding that the three cases known as, Siliconware Precision Industries Co., Ltd. et al.
10
v. Tessera, Case No. C 08-03667 RS; Advanced Semiconductor Engineering Inc. et al. v.
11
Tessera, Case No. C 08-03726 EMC; and Chipmos Technologies Inc. et al. v. Tessera, Inc., Case
12
No. C 08-03827 CW, were related to the AMD case (these three cases are collectively the
13
“Related Cases”); and
14
3.
WHEREAS, this Court stayed all proceedings in the Related Cases, to include all
15
claims and counterclaims, by its order of December 19, 2008 “[i]n light of the decision by the
16
International Trade Commission (‘ITC’) granting Tessera’s motion to amend the Complaint and
17
Notice of Investigation adding U.S. Patent No. 5,663,106 to the investigation” known as 337-
18
TA-649 and the stipulation of the parties in the Related Cases; and
19
4.
WHEREAS, this Court issued a Related Case Order on November 10, 2010,
20
finding that the case known as Spansion Inc. v. Tessera Inc., Case No. C 10-04954 MMC (the
21
“Spansion case”), is related to this case; and
22
5.
WHEREAS, by its orders of December 7, 2010 this Court subsequently set a Case
23
Management Conference in the AMD case, the Spansion case and the Related Cases for June 7,
24
2011 at 2:00 p.m; and
25
6.
WHEREAS the parties in the AMD, Spansion, and Related Cases, by their
26
undersigned counsel, report to the Court that the current status of the International Trade
27
Commission Investigation 337-TA-605, which is under appeal to the Federal Circuit in Case
28
1
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CHANGING THE DATE
CASE NO. 4:05-cv-04063-CW
OF UPCOMING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND RELATED DATES
Error! Bookmark not defined.
1
Number 09-1460, is that the Federal Circuit issued its decision on December 21, 2010, affirming
2
the Commission’s final determination, but all appeals have not yet been exhausted. In particular,
3
the period for any petitions to the United States Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari has not yet
4
run, and at least one defendant in the AMD Case intends to seek such a petition, and;
5
7.
WHEREAS, because a final resolution of ITC’s 337-TA-605 investigation,
6
including appeals, is still pending, and therefore the parties in the AMD case, in the Spansion
7
case, and in the Related Cases believe that it would be most efficient to further postpone the case
8
management conference and related activity in the AMD case, the Spansion case, and the
9
Related Cases until approximately November 8, 2011; and
10
11
12
8.
WHEREAS, the parties appearing below agree that there would be no prejudice to
the parties in moving the case management conference, as that case is currently stayed;
THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the
13
parties appearing below through their undersigned respective attorneys of record, based on the
14
foregoing, and subject to the approval of this Court, that:
15
a.
The case management conference currently scheduled for June 7, 2011, at 2:00
16
2 00 p
November 8,
p.m. in the AMD case shall be rescheduled for ___________ 2011 at __:__ __.m., or as soon
17
thereafter as the Court is available;
18
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
19
20
Dated this 25th day of
May
, 2011.
Honorable Claudia Wilken
United States District Judge
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CHANGING THE DATE
CASE NO. 4:10-cv-04954-CW
OF UPCOMING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND RELATED DATES
Error! Bookmark not defined.
1
Dated: May 24, 2011
/s/
Elaine Chow
K&L GATES LLP
Attorneys for defendants and counter-claimants
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC.,
SPANSION TECHNOLOGY INC., SPANSION
INC. and SPANSION LLC
Dated: May 24, 2011
/s/
Gina A. Bibby
FOLEY & LARDNER LLP
Attorneys for defendants and counter-claimants
ADVANCED SEMICONDUCTOR
ENGINEERING, INC., ASE TEST LIMITED, and
ASE (U.S.) INC.
Dated: May 24, 2011
/s/
Michael Heafey
ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE
Attorneys for defendants and counter-claimants
SILICONWARE PRECISION INDUSTRIES CO.,
LTD. and SILICONWARE U.S.A.
Dated: May 24, 2011
/s/
Joseph Lanser
SEYFARTH SHAW
Attorneys for defendants and counter-claimants
CHIPMOS TECHNOLOGIES INC. and CHIPMOS
U.S.A. INC.
Dated: May 24, 2011
/s/
Russell L. Johnson
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
Attorneys for defendants and counter-claimants
STMICROELECTRONICS N.V. and
STMICROELECTRONICS, INC.
Dated: May 24, 2011
/s/
Michael Franzinger
WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP
Attorneys for defendants and counter-claimants
STATS CHIPPAC INC., STATS CHIPPAC LTD
and STATS CHIPPAC (BVI) LIMITED
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Dated: May 24, 2011
25
/s/
Trevor Stockinger
IRELL & MANELLA LLP
Attorneys for plaintiff and counter-defendant
TESSERA, INC.
26
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CHANGING THE DATE
CASE NO. 4:10-cv-04954-CW
OF UPCOMING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND RELATED DATES
Error! Bookmark not defined.
1
2
Concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the signatories listed
above.
3
4
Dated: May 24, 2011
5
K&L GATES LLP
/s/
Elaine Chow
Attorneys for defendants and counter-claimants
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC.,
SPANSION TECHNOLOGY INC., SPANSION
INC. and SPANSION LLC
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CHANGING THE DATE
CASE NO. 4:10-cv-04954-CW
OF UPCOMING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND RELATED DATES
Error! Bookmark not defined.
1
Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X, I hereby attest that I have on file all
2
holographic signatures for any indicated by a “conformed” signature /s/ within the e-filed
3
document.
4
5
Dated: May 24, 2011
6
K&L GATES LLP
/s/
Elaine Chow
Attorneys for defendants and counter-claimants
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC.,
SPANSION TECHNOLOGY INC., SPANSION
INC. and SPANSION LLC
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CHANGING THE DATE
CASE NO. 4:10-cv-04954-CW
OF UPCOMING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND RELATED DATES
Error! Bookmark not defined.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?