Cordua v. Navistar International Transportation Corp. et al

Filing 7

ORDER VACATING HEARING DATE ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO TRANSFER, PENDING CONSENT TO JURISDICTION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Previously noticed hearing date of 1/13/2011 re 6 MOTION to Transfer Case filed by Gulf Stream Coach, Inc. has been VACATED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 11/16/2010. (dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/16/2010)

Download PDF
Cordua v. Navistar International Transportation Corp. et al Doc. 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 KEVIN CORDUA, Plaintiff, v. NAVISTAR INTERNATIONAL TRANSPORTATION CORP, et al. Defendants. ____________________________________/ On November 10, 2010, Defendant Gulf Stream Coach, Inc. ("Gulf Stream"), filed a Motion to Transfer ("Motion"), pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1404(a). See Docket No. 6. Defendant Gulf Stream noticed a hearing date on the Motion of January 13, 2011 at 11:00 a.m. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), the Magistrate Judges of this District have been designated to conduct any and all proceedings in a civil case, upon the consent of all parties. The parties in the above-captioned case have not filed either a consent or declination to proceed before a Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, the January 13, 2011 hearing date on Defendant's Motion is hereby VACATED. Upon the filing of signed consents by the parties, the Court will issue an order resetting the hearing. If a declination is filed, the case will be immediately reassigned to an Article III District Judge. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 16, 2010 DONNA M. RYU United States Magistrate Judge No. C-10-04961-DMR ORDER VACATING HEARING DATE ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO TRANSFER, PENDING CONSENT TO JURISDICTION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?