California Institute of Computer Assisted Surgery, Inc. v. Med-Surgical Services, Inc. et al
Filing
37
ORDER Granting 36 Stipulation re: 33 MOTION for Leave to File Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 4/18/2011. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/18/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
MELINDA M. MORTON, Bar No. 209373
mmorton@be-law.com
BERGESON, LLP
303 Almaden Boulevard, Suite 500
San Jose, CA 95110-2712
Telephone: (408) 291-6200
Facsimile: (408) 297-6000
Attorneys for Defendants
MED-SURGICAL SERVICES, INC.,
KRISHNA SUDHAKARAN, and MARK KIENE
Ali Aalaei, Bar No. 254713
Ari Law, P.C.
22 Battery St., Suite #1000
San Francisco, CA 94111
Email: ali@arilaw.com
Tel: (415) 357-3600
Fax: (415) 357-3602
Attorneys for Plaintiff,
CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF COMPUTER
ASSISTED SURGERY, INC.
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
16
17
OAKLAND DIVISION
CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF COMPUTER
ASSISTED SURGERY, INC., a California
corporation,
18
19
20
21
22
Case No. C10-05067 CW
ORDER RE: LEAVE TO AMEND
COMPLAINT
Plaintiff,
Complaint filed: November 9, 2010
vs.
MED-SURGICAL SERVICES, INC., a
California corporation, KRISHNA
SUDHAKARAN, an individual, MARK KIENE,
an individual,
Defendants.
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No. 10-05067 (CW)
1
2
3
4
5
6
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED that plaintiff shall have leave to
file an amended complaint on or before June 27, 2011.
IT IS ORDERED FURTHER that the case management order deadline to add additional
parties, D.I. 30, is moved from May 23, 2011 to June 27, 2011.
IT IS ORDERED FURTHER that plaintiff’s pending motion for an order granting leave to
amend the complaint, D.I. 33, is terminated.
7
8
9
10
IT IS SO ORDERED.
11
12
Dated: 4/18/2011
_____________________
13
DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-1[PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No. C10-05067 CW
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?