California Institute of Computer Assisted Surgery, Inc. v. Med-Surgical Services, Inc. et al

Filing 37

ORDER Granting 36 Stipulation re: 33 MOTION for Leave to File Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 4/18/2011. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/18/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 MELINDA M. MORTON, Bar No. 209373 mmorton@be-law.com BERGESON, LLP 303 Almaden Boulevard, Suite 500 San Jose, CA 95110-2712 Telephone: (408) 291-6200 Facsimile: (408) 297-6000 Attorneys for Defendants MED-SURGICAL SERVICES, INC., KRISHNA SUDHAKARAN, and MARK KIENE Ali Aalaei, Bar No. 254713 Ari Law, P.C. 22 Battery St., Suite #1000 San Francisco, CA 94111 Email: ali@arilaw.com Tel: (415) 357-3600 Fax: (415) 357-3602 Attorneys for Plaintiff, CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY, INC. 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 16 17 OAKLAND DIVISION CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY, INC., a California corporation, 18 19 20 21 22 Case No. C10-05067 CW ORDER RE: LEAVE TO AMEND COMPLAINT Plaintiff, Complaint filed: November 9, 2010 vs. MED-SURGICAL SERVICES, INC., a California corporation, KRISHNA SUDHAKARAN, an individual, MARK KIENE, an individual, Defendants. 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No. 10-05067 (CW) 1 2 3 4 5 6 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED that plaintiff shall have leave to file an amended complaint on or before June 27, 2011. IT IS ORDERED FURTHER that the case management order deadline to add additional parties, D.I. 30, is moved from May 23, 2011 to June 27, 2011. IT IS ORDERED FURTHER that plaintiff’s pending motion for an order granting leave to amend the complaint, D.I. 33, is terminated. 7 8 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. 11 12 Dated: 4/18/2011 _____________________ 13 DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -1[PROPOSED] ORDER Case No. C10-05067 CW

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?