Bay Area Painters and Tapers Joint Apprenticeship Training Funds and their Joint Boards of Trustees et al v. Ibarra Coatings, Inc. et al
Filing
27
NOTICE OF REFERENCE, ORDER Setting Hearing on Motion 20 MOTION for Default Judgment as to Ibarra Coatings, Inc. and Daniel Ibarra, Jr. : Motion Hearing set for 9/29/2011 10:00 AM in Courtroom B, 15th Floor, San Francisco before Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James.. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 6/14/2011. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/14/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
Northern District of California
7
8
BAY AREA PAINTERS AND TAPERS
PENSION TRUST FUND,
9
No. C 10-05174 SBA (MEJ)
NOTICE OF REFERRAL
Plaintiff(s),
10
v.
IBARRA COATINGS INC,
12
For the Northern District of California
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
Defendant(s).
_____________________________________/
13
14
The above-captioned case was referred to Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James to prepare a
15
report and recommendation on Plaintiff's pending Motion for Default Judgment. (Dkt. #20.)
16
Accordingly, the Court shall conduct a hearing on September 29, 2011 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom
17
B, 15th Floor, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California. Defendant shall file any
18
opposition to Plaintiff's motion by September 1, 2011, and Plaintiff shall file any reply by September
19
15, 2011.
20
If no opposition is filed, Plaintiff shall file detailed proposed findings of fact and conclusions
21
of law by September 15, 2011. The proposed findings shall address the following: (1) the basis for
22
the Court's subject matter jurisdiction; (2) the basis for the Court's personal jurisdiction, which, if
23
seeking default judgment against any out-of-state defendants, shall include a minimum contacts
24
analysis under Schwarzenegger v. Fred Martin Motor Co., 374 F.3d 797, 802 (9th Cir. 2004); and
25
(3) an analysis of each individual factor in Eitel v. McCool, 782 F.2d 1470, 1471-72 (9th Cir. 1986).
26
Further, if Plaintiff seeks attorney's fees and costs, the proposed findings shall include the
27
following: (1) evidence supporting the request for hours worked, including a breakdown and
28
identification of the subject matter of each person’s time expenditures; (2) evidence that the
1
requested rates are in line with those prevailing in the community for similar services of lawyers of
2
reasonably comparable skill and reputation; and (3) rate determinations in other cases of similarly
3
complex litigation, particularly those setting a rate for the plaintiff's attorney. Plaintiff shall ensure
4
that a copy of the proposed findings is emailed to mejpo@cand.uscourts.gov. The Court prefers that
5
proposed findings be emailed in WordPerfect format; however, Microsoft Word format is also
6
acceptable.
7
In addition, the parties shall lodge with chambers a printed copy of any electronically-filed
printed copies shall be marked “Chambers Copy” and shall be submitted to the Clerk’s Office, in an
10
envelope clearly marked with "Magistrate Judge James," the case number and “E-Filing Chambers
11
Copy.” ALL CHAMBERS COPIES MUST INCLUDE ON EACH PAGE THE RUNNING
12
For the Northern District of California
documents by noon of the next court day following the day the papers are filed electronically. These
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
HEADER CREATED BY THE ECF SYSTEM. ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS
13
MUST BE CITED IN ALL OTHER DOCUMENTS AS FOLLOWS: DKT#__ AT __.
14
15
16
Plaintiff shall serve this order upon all other parties in this action. Please contact the
courtroom deputy, Brenda Tolbert, at (415) 522-4708 with any questions.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
17
18
Dated: June 14, 2011
_______________________________
Maria-Elena James
Chief United States Magistrate Judge
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?