BSD, Inc et al v. Equilon Enterprises, LLC et al

Filing 25

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO RELATE. Accordingly, the Court finds that Shahriar Almasi, et al. v. Equilon Enterprises, LLC, Case No. 10-CV-03458-JW is not related to BSD, Inc., et al. v. Equilon Enterprises, LLC, et al., Case No.10-CV-05223-SBA within the meaning of Rule 3-12(a). Signed by Judge James Ware on 12/15/2010. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/15/2010)

Download PDF
BSD, Inc et al v. Equilon Enterprises, LLC et al Doc. 25 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Shahriar Almasi, et al., v. Plaintiffs, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION NO. C 10-03458 JW NO. C 10-05223-SBA ORDER DENYING MOTION TO RELATE United United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Equilon Enterprises, LLC, Defendant. BSD, Inc., et al., v. Plaintiffs, / Equilon Enterprises, LLC, et al., Defendants. / Presently before the Court is Equilon Enterprises, LLC's ("Defendant") Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Cases Should be Related.1 Defendant's Motion seeks the Court's determination as to whether Shahriar Almasi, et al. v. Equilon Enterprises, LLC, Case No. 10-CV03458-JW ("Almasi Case") should be related to BSD, Inc., et al. v. Equilon Enterprises, LLC, et al., Case No. 10-CV-05223-SBA ("BSD Case"). (Motion at 1.) Civil Local Rule 3-12(a) provides: An action is related to another action when: 1 (hereafter, "Motion," Docket Item No. 24.) Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 (1) (2) The action concerns substantially the same parties, property, transaction or event; and It appears likely that there will be an unduly burdensome duplication of labor and expense or conflicting results if the cases are conducted before different judges. Here, the two actions involve completely different Plaintiffs, and the BSD Case involves a second Defendant, Anabi Oil Corporation, that is not involved in the Almasi Case. Moreover, the properties at issue, along with their accompanying leases, are different in the two cases. The "Right of First Refusal Offer" letters at issue in the two cases are also different. Because the cases raise different questions of liability regarding separate properties and leases, there is no risk of inconsistent judgments. Thus, the Court finds that there is no risk of "unduly burdensome duplication of labor and expenses or conflicting results if the cases are conducted before different Judges." Accordingly, the Court finds that Shahriar Almasi, et al. v. Equilon Enterprises, LLC, Case No. 10-CV-03458-JW is not related to BSD, Inc., et al. v. Equilon Enterprises, LLC, et al., Case No. 10-CV-05223-SBA within the meaning of Rule 3-12(a). United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: December 15, 2010 JAMES WARE United States District Judge 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT COPIES OF THIS ORDER HAVE BEEN DELIVERED TO: Jocelyn Dana Hannah jhannah@wilsonturnerkosmo.com Robin Assaf Wofford rwofford@wilsonturnerkosmo.com Thomas Paul Bleau bleaushark@aol.com Dated: December 15, 2010 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk By: /s/ JW Chambers Elizabeth Garcia Courtroom Deputy United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?