Uromed Technology, Inc. et al v. Granger et al
STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING MOTION HEARING TO DECEMBER 15, 2011. OPPOSITION DUE BY NOVEMBER 24, 2011. REPLY DUE BY DECEMBER 1, 2011.. Signed by Judge Beeler on 10/19/2011. (lblc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/19/2011)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MICHAEL Y. GRANGER, et al.
UROMED TECHNOLOGY, INC., et al.
Case No. C10-05242
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE BRIEFING AND HEARING DATES RE: CONTINGENT
MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE COUNTERCLAIM, MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON
PLEADINGS, AND CONTINGENT MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT;
AND PROPOSED ORDER
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between all of the attorneys of record of
the parties who have appeared in this action, that the Defendants Kenneth E. Feltman’s, Michael Y.
Granger’s, and Kenneth Feltman Insurance Trust’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings Dismissing
Complaint for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction, Contingent Motion for Leave to File Counterclaim, and
Contingent Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, currently scheduled for hearing on November 3,
2011 at 11:00, Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler presiding, be postponed and continued for hearing until
December 15, 2011 at 11:00 a.m, or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard by this Court.
Plaintiffs’ deadline to file any opposition to Defendants’ motions shall be continued from November
14, 2011 to December 1, 2011 or to such date as appropriate based upon the hearing date for the
motions provided by the Court. Defendants’ deadline to file any reply to said opposition shall be
continued from November 21, 2011 to December 8, 2011 or to such date as appropriate based upon the
hearing date for the motions provided by the Court.
Said continuance is desired to allow the parties sufficient time to concentrate on finalizing a
CV 10-5242 LB
STIPULATION AND ORDER
tentative settlement reached during the settlement conference before Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu.
Plaintiff UroMed Technology, Inc. is pursuing outside financing to fund said settlement, but requires
additional time to determine whether such financing will materialize.
DATED: October 11, 2011
Steven Rood, Esq., Bar No. 69332
LAW OFFICE OF STEVEN ROOD
405 – 14th Street, Suite 212
Oakland, CA 94612
510-839-0900 and (Fax) 510-839-0230
Counsel for Defendants
/s/ Steven Rood
William Acevedo (Bar No. 194106)
WENDEL, ROSEN, BLACK & DEAN LLP
1111 Broadway, 24th Floor
Oakland, CA 94607
(510) 834-6600 and (Fax) 834-1928
Counsel for Plaintiffs
/s/ William Acevedo
Based on the Stipulation of the parties, and for good cause appearing, the hearing of
Defendants’ Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings Dismissing Complaint for Lack of Personal
Jurisdiction, Contingent Motion for Leave to File Counterclaim, and Contingent Motion for Partial
Summary Judgment, is continued from November 3, 2011 at 11:00 a.m. in Department 4 of this Court
to ____________________, 2011 at 11:00 a.m. in Department 4 of this Court. Plaintiffs’ opposition, if
any, to said motions shall be filed no later than _________________, 2011. Defendants’ reply, if any,
to said opposition shall be filed no later than ___________________, 2011.
October 19, 2011
Magistrate dge LaurelLaurel Beeler
CV 10-5242 LB
STIPULATION AND ORDER
IT IS S
IT IS SO ORDERED.
D IS T IC T O
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?