Geeknet, Inc. et al v. Tightrope Interactive, Inc.

Filing 29

ORDER by Judge ARMSTRONG DENIED as moot 11 Motion to Dismiss (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/8/2011)

Download PDF
Geeknet, Inc. et al v. Tightrope Interactive, Inc. Doc. 29 1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION Case No: C 10-5244 SBA ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTERCLAIM AS MOOT Docket 11 4 GEEKNET, INC., a Delaware Corporation, and VIDEOLAN, a French Not for Profit 5 Association, 6 7 Plaintiffs, vs. Delaware Corporation, 8 TIGHTROPE INTERACTIVE, INC., a 9 Defendant. 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiffs filed a Motion to Dismiss Counterclaim on January 14, 2011. Dkt. 11, 16. On January 26, 2011, Defendants filed a First Amended Answer and Counterclaims. Dkt. 20. On February 28, 2011, Plaintiffs filed Answers to the amended counterclaims. Dkt. 27, 28. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. 2. Plaintiffs' Motion to Dismiss Counterclaim is DENIED AS MOOT. The Case Management Conference currently scheduled for April 19, 2011, is CONTINUED to May 12, 2011 at 3:30 p.m. Prior to the date scheduled for the conference, the parties shall meet and confer and prepare a joint Case Management Conference Statement. The joint statement shall be filed no later than ten (10) days prior to the conference and shall comply with the Standing Order for All Judges of the Northern District of California and the Standing Order of this Court. Plaintiffs shall be responsible for filing the statement as well as for arranging the conference call. All parties shall be on the line and shall call (510) 637-3559 at the above indicated date and time. 3. This Order terminates Docket 11. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 7, 2011 _______________________________ SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG United States District Judge Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?