D'Lil v. Bay Parking, LLC et al
ORDER GRANTING 9 Proposed Order, filed by Edward S. Aslanian, Hollynn D'Lil, Eleonore M. Aslanian. Signed by Judge Beeler on 2/28/11. (lblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/1/2011)
D'Lil v. Bay Parking, LLC et al
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
SEYFARTH SHAW LLP Kristina M. Launey (SBN 221335) E-mail: email@example.com 400 Capitol Mall, Suite 2350 Sacramento, California 95814-4428 Telephone: (916) 448-0159 Facsimile: (916) 558-4839 Attorneys for Defendants EDWARD S. ASLANIAN and ELEONORE M. ASLANIAN THIMESCH LAW OFFICES Timothy S. Thimesch (SBN 148213) 158 Hilltop Crescent Walnut Creek, California 94576-3452 Telephone: (925) 855-8235 Facsimile: (888) 210-8868 Attorneys for Plaintiff HOLLYNN D'LIL
11 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 HOLLYNN D'LIL, 15 Plaintiff, 16 v. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Pursuant to Local Rules 6.1(b) and 6.2, Plaintiff Hollynn D'Lil and Defendants Edward S. Aslanian and Eleonore M. Aslanian ("Defendants"), by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate to extend the deadline for Defendants to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint to April 1, 2011. The parties had previously stipulated to extend Defendants' answer deadline to March 2, 2011 (and prior to that, to January 31, 2011). This stipulation is entered into for the purpose of allowing the parties to continue settlement discussions, and therefore will not affect or alter any deadline previously set by Court order other than certain deadlines set by
BAY PARKING, LLC; ERCUMAN KARADAG; EDWARD S. ASLANIAN; ELEONORE M. ASLANIAN; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Defendants.
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Case No. CV 10 5405 (LB) THIRD STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS EDWARD S. ASLANIAN AND ELEONORE M. ASLANIAN TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
Complaint Filed: November 29, 2010
Case No. CV 10 5405 (LB) THIRD STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS EDWARD S. ASLANIAN AND ELEONORE M. ASLANIAN TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT Dockets.Justia.com
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
General Order 56. Pursuant to Local Rule 6.2, the reasons for the requested enlargement of time, all previous time modifications in the case, and a description of the effect the requested time modification would have on the schedule for the case are outlined in the attached Declaration of Kristina M. Launey. IT IS SO STIPULATED. DATED: February 25, 2011 SEYFARTH SHAW LLP
s/ Kristina M. Launey Kristina M. Launey Attorneys for Defendants EDWARD S. ASLANIAN and ELEONORE M. ASLANIAN DATED: February 25, 2011 THE THIMESCH LAW FIRM
s/ Timothy S. Thimesch Timothy S. Thimesch Attorneys for Plaintiff HOLLYNN D'LIL
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
February 28, 2011 DATED: __________________
____________________________________ RED District Court SO ORDE Judge S
S DISTRICT TE C TA
RT U O
F D IS T IC T O R
2 Case No. CV 10 5405 (LB) THIRD STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS EDWARD S. ASLANIAN AND ELEONORE M. ASLANIAN TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
aure Judge L
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?