Koehn v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Company Long Term Disability Plan
Filing
29
ORDER Granting 28 Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 4/29/2011. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/29/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
TERESA S. RENAKER (SBN 187800)
JULIA CAMPINS (SBN 238023)
LEWIS, FEINBERG, LEE, RENAKER & JACKSON, PC
476-9th Street
Suite 1800
Oakland, California 94607
Telephone: (510) 839-6824
Facsimile: (510) 839-7839
E-Mail: trenaker@lewisfeinberg.com
jcampins@lewisfeinberg.com
6
7
Attorneys for Plaintiff
DAVID KOEHN
8
9
10
11
STEVEN H. FRANKEL (SBN 171919)
SNR DENTON US LLP
525 Market Street, 26th Floor
San Francisco, California 94105
Telephone: (415) 882-5000
Facsimile: (415) 882-0300
E-Mail: steven.frankel@snrdenton.com
12
13
Attorneys for Defendant
FIREMAN’S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY
LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN
14
15
16
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
17
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
18
OAKLAND DIVISION
19
No. 10-05439 CW
20
DAVID KOEHN,
21
22
Plaintiff.
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL
WITH PREJUDICE AND ORDER
vs.
[Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A(ii)]
23
24
25
FIREMAN’S FUND INSURANCE
COMPANY LONG TERM DISABILITY
PLAN,
Judge: Hon. Claudia Wilken
Defendant
26
27
28
CASE NO. 10-05439 CW
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL
WITH PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
1
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the parties hereby stipulate
2
that this action shall be DISMISSED in its entirety WITH PREJUDICE. Each side shall bear its
3
own fees and costs.
4
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
5
6
Dated: April 28, 2011
7
LEWIS, FEINBERG, LEE, RENAKER & JACKSON, PC
8
By /s/ Julia Campins_______
Julia Campins
Attorneys for Plaintiff
DAVID KOEHN
9
10
11
12
Dated: April 28, 2011
SNR DENTON US LLP
13
By /s/ Steven H. Frankel_____
Steven H. Frankel
Attorneys for Defendant
FIREMAN’S FUND INSURANCE
COMPANY LONG TERM DISABILITY
PLAN
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
ORDER
Pursuant to Stipulation, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed in its
entirety with prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Each party shall
bear its own fees and costs.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 29, 2011
24
25
______________________
Claudia Wilken
United States District Judge
26
27
28
CASE NO. 10-05439 CW
-1-
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL
WITH PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
1
2
CERTIFICATION
I, Steven H. Frankel, am the ECF User whose identification and password are being
3
used to file this Stipulation For Dismissal With Prejudice and [Proposed] Order. In compliance
4
with General Order 45.X.B., I hereby attest that Julia Campins, counsel for Plaintiff, concurred in
5
this filing.
6
7
Dated: April 28, 2011
/s/ Steven H. Frankel_____
Steven H. Frankel
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
CASE NO. 10-05439 CW
-2-
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL
WITH PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
1
PROOF OF SERVICE
2
I, Diane Vivian Donner, hereby declare:
3
I am employed in the City and County of San Francisco, California in the office of a
4
member of the bar of this court whose direction the following service was made. I am over the age
5
of eighteen years and not a party to the within action. My business address is SNR Denton US
6
LLP, 525 Market Street, 26th Floor, San Francisco, California 94105.
7
8
9
On April 28, 2011, the following document, described as:
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
10
was served via CM/ECF by the Clerk of the Court, upon all counsel of record registered to
11
receive electronic filing, as indicated on the Court’s website, or by United States Mail, upon
12
those parties not registered for electronic filing.
13
14
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the
foregoing is true and correct. Executed on April 28, 2011 at San Francisco, California.
15
16
/s/ Diane Vivian Donner
Diane Vivian Donner
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
CASE NO. 10-05439 CW
-3-
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL
WITH PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?