Koehn v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Company Long Term Disability Plan

Filing 29

ORDER Granting 28 Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 4/29/2011. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/29/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 TERESA S. RENAKER (SBN 187800) JULIA CAMPINS (SBN 238023) LEWIS, FEINBERG, LEE, RENAKER & JACKSON, PC 476-9th Street Suite 1800 Oakland, California 94607 Telephone: (510) 839-6824 Facsimile: (510) 839-7839 E-Mail: trenaker@lewisfeinberg.com jcampins@lewisfeinberg.com 6 7 Attorneys for Plaintiff DAVID KOEHN 8 9 10 11 STEVEN H. FRANKEL (SBN 171919) SNR DENTON US LLP 525 Market Street, 26th Floor San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: (415) 882-5000 Facsimile: (415) 882-0300 E-Mail: steven.frankel@snrdenton.com 12 13 Attorneys for Defendant FIREMAN’S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN 14 15 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 17 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 18 OAKLAND DIVISION 19 No. 10-05439 CW 20 DAVID KOEHN, 21 22 Plaintiff. STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND ORDER vs. [Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A(ii)] 23 24 25 FIREMAN’S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN, Judge: Hon. Claudia Wilken Defendant 26 27 28 CASE NO. 10-05439 CW STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the parties hereby stipulate 2 that this action shall be DISMISSED in its entirety WITH PREJUDICE. Each side shall bear its 3 own fees and costs. 4 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 5 6 Dated: April 28, 2011 7 LEWIS, FEINBERG, LEE, RENAKER & JACKSON, PC 8 By /s/ Julia Campins_______ Julia Campins Attorneys for Plaintiff DAVID KOEHN 9 10 11 12 Dated: April 28, 2011 SNR DENTON US LLP 13 By /s/ Steven H. Frankel_____ Steven H. Frankel Attorneys for Defendant FIREMAN’S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 ORDER Pursuant to Stipulation, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Each party shall bear its own fees and costs. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 29, 2011 24 25 ______________________ Claudia Wilken United States District Judge 26 27 28 CASE NO. 10-05439 CW -1- STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 2 CERTIFICATION I, Steven H. Frankel, am the ECF User whose identification and password are being 3 used to file this Stipulation For Dismissal With Prejudice and [Proposed] Order. In compliance 4 with General Order 45.X.B., I hereby attest that Julia Campins, counsel for Plaintiff, concurred in 5 this filing. 6 7 Dated: April 28, 2011 /s/ Steven H. Frankel_____ Steven H. Frankel 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CASE NO. 10-05439 CW -2- STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 PROOF OF SERVICE 2 I, Diane Vivian Donner, hereby declare: 3 I am employed in the City and County of San Francisco, California in the office of a 4 member of the bar of this court whose direction the following service was made. I am over the age 5 of eighteen years and not a party to the within action. My business address is SNR Denton US 6 LLP, 525 Market Street, 26th Floor, San Francisco, California 94105. 7 8 9 On April 28, 2011, the following document, described as: STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 10 was served via CM/ECF by the Clerk of the Court, upon all counsel of record registered to 11 receive electronic filing, as indicated on the Court’s website, or by United States Mail, upon 12 those parties not registered for electronic filing. 13 14 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on April 28, 2011 at San Francisco, California. 15 16 /s/ Diane Vivian Donner Diane Vivian Donner 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CASE NO. 10-05439 CW -3- STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?