SuccessFactors, Inc. v. Halogen Software, Inc.

Filing 58

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 48 Stipulation, filed by SuccessFactors, Inc., Halogen Software, Inc.. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 3/28/11. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/29/2011)

SuccessFactors, Inc. v. Halogen Software, Inc.

Doc. 58

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

PATRICK E. PREMO (CSB NO. 184915) [e-mail] LIWEN MAH (CSB NO. 239033) [e-mail] SEBASTIAN KAPLAN (CSB NO. 248206) [e-mail] GUINEVERE L. JOBSON (CSB NO. 251907) [e-mail] FENWICK & WEST LLP Silicon Valley Center 801 California Street Mountain View, California 94041 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Plaintiff SUCCESSFACTORS, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12
F ENWICK & W EST LLP

OAKLAND DIVISION
ATTORNEYS AT LAW MOUNTAIN VIEW

13 14 SUCCESSFACTORS, INC., 15 Plaintiff, 16 v. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff SuccessFactors, Inc. ("SuccessFactors") and Defendant Halogen Software Inc. ("Halogen") through their respective attorneys of record that Plaintiff may file an Amended Complaint, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A. IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that the Amended Complaint shall be deemed served as of the time it is filed. IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that in light of the Amended Complaint, Defendant's pending motion to dismiss (Docket No. 27, set for hearing at 1:00 P.M. on April 5, 2011) is hereby
STIPULATION TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT
AND ENLARGING TIME TO RESPOND

Case No. 10-05471-SBA (BZ) STIPULATION FOR FILING OF AMENDED COMPLAINT AND EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT HALOGEN SOFTWARE INC. TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPLAINT Dept: Judge: Courtroom 1, 4th Floor Hon. Saundra Brown Armstrong

HALOGEN SOFTWARE, INC., a Canadian corporation; and DOES 1-5, inclusive, Defendants.

CASE NO.: 10-05471-SBA (BZ)

Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
F ENWICK & W EST LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW MOUNTAIN VIEW

withdrawn and should be taken off calendar. IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that pursuant to Rule 15(a)(3), which requires a court order to extend the time to respond to an amended pleading, Halogen shall have until April 8, 2011 to answer or otherwise respond to the Amended Complaint. Dated: March 18, 2011 FENWICK & WEST LLP

By: /s/ Patrick E. Premo Patrick E. Premo Attorneys for Plaintiff SUCCESSFACTORS, INC. Dated: March 18, 2011 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP By: /s/ Evette D. Pennypacker Evette D. Pennypacker Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP 555 Twin Dolphin Drive, 5th Floor Redwood Shores, California 94065 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Defendants HALOGEN SOFTWARE, INC. ATTORNEY ATTESTATION Pursuant to General Order 45, I hereby attest that that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the signatory indicated by a `conformed' signature (/s/) within this electronically filed document. /s/ Patrick E. Premo Patrick E. Premo Attorneys for Plaintiff SUCCESSFACTORS, INC.

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
STIPULATION TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT
AND ENLARGING TIME TO RESPOND

2

CASE NO.: 10-05471-SBA (BZ)

1 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
F ENWICK & W EST LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW MOUNTAIN VIEW

__________________________________________ Date: _3/28/11 HONORABLE SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG United States District Court Judge

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
STIPULATION TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT
AND ENLARGING TIME TO RESPOND

3

CASE NO.: 10-05471-SBA (BZ)