SuccessFactors, Inc. v. Halogen Software, Inc.
Filing
76
STIPULATION AND ORDER: Setting Briefing Schedule for Motion to Compel. : That SuccessFactors, Inc.'s Motion to Compel due 06/06/11; Halogen Software, Inc.'s Opposition due 06/13/11; SuccessFactors, Inc.'s Reply due 06/17/11. Motion to Compel to be heard on 06/21/11 or 06/22/11. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman, on 6/9/2011. (bzsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/9/2011) Modified on 6/10/2011 (jlm, COURT STAFF).
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
PATRICK E. PREMO (CSB NO. 184915)
ppremo@fenwick.com
LIWEN MAH (CSB NO. 239033)
lmah@fenwick.com
SEBASTIAN KAPLAN (CSB NO. 248206)
skaplan@fenwick.com
GUINEVERE L. JOBSON (CSB NO. 251907)
gjobson@fenwick.com
FENWICK & WEST LLP
Silicon Valley Center
801 California Street
Mountain View, California 94041
Telephone: (650) 988-8500
Facsimile: (650) 938-5200
8
9
Attorneys for Plaintiff
SUCCESSFACTORS, INC.
MOUNTAIN VIEW
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
F ENWICK & W EST LLP
10
OAKLAND DIVISION
13
14
SUCCESSFACTORS, INC.,
Plaintiff,
15
16
17
Case No. 10-05471-SBA (BZ)
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR
SUCCESSFACTORS’ MOTION TO COMPEL
v.
HALOGEN SOFTWARE, INC., a Canadian
corporation; and DOES 1-5, inclusive,
Courtroom: G, 15th Floor
Judge:
Honorable Bernard Zimmerman
18
Defendants.
19
20
STIPULATION
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
WHEREAS, the Court has given Plaintiff SuccessFactors, Inc. (“SuccessFactors”) leave to
move to compel Defendant Halogen Software, Inc. (“Halogen”);
WHEREAS, following a meet-and-confer on May 31, 2011, the Court instructed counsel for
the parties to confer about a briefing schedule for any such motion to compel by SuccessFactors;
WHEREAS, no previous briefing schedule has been set for SuccessFactors’ motion to
compel;
28
STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING
BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR SUCCESSFACTORS’
MOTION TO COMPEL
CASE NO.: 10-05471-SBA (BZ)
1
2
WHEREAS, counsel for the parties agree that the following briefing schedule is appropriate
and will not affect the overall schedule of this case;
3
NOW, THEREFORE, SuccessFactors and Halogen STIPULATE AND AGREE that
4
SuccessFactors will file its motion to compel on June 6, 2011, that Halogen will file any opposition to
5
the motion to compel on or before June 13, 2011, and that SuccessFactors will file its reply on or
6
before June 17, 2011. SuccessFactors and Halogen further STIPULATE AND AGREE that
7
SuccessFactors’ motion to compel shall be heard on June 21 or 22, 2011 if necessary, or on such other
8
date set by the Court.
9
10
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
Dated:
June 6, 2011
FENWICK & WEST LLP
11
/s/ Patrick E. Premo
Patrick E. Premo
Attorneys for Plaintiff
SUCCESSFACTORS, INC.
By
MOUNTAIN VIEW
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
F ENWICK & W EST LLP
12
13
14
15
Dated:
June 6, 2011
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN, LLP
16
/s/ Evette Pennypacker
By ________________________________
Evette Pennypacker
Attorneys for Defendant
HALOGEN SOFTWARE, INC.
17
18
19
ATTORNEY ATTESTATION
20
21
Pursuant to General Order 45, I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this
22
document has been obtained from the signatory indicated by a ‘conformed’ signature (/S/) within
23
this e -filed document.
24
/s/ Liwen Mah
Liwen Mah
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING
BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR SUCCESSFACTORS’
MOTION TO COMPEL
2
CASE NO.: 10-05471-SBA (BZ)
1
2
3
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. , except that no hearing will occur
unless scheduled by the Court.
9
Dated: June ___, 2011
______________________________________
Honorable Bernard Zimmerman
Magistrate Judge
United States District Court
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
MOUNTAIN VIEW
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
F ENWICK & W EST LLP
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING
BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR SUCCESSFACTORS’
MOTION TO COMPEL
3
CASE NO.: 10-05471-SBA (BZ)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?