SuccessFactors, Inc. v. Halogen Software, Inc.

Filing 76

STIPULATION AND ORDER: Setting Briefing Schedule for Motion to Compel. : That SuccessFactors, Inc.'s Motion to Compel due 06/06/11; Halogen Software, Inc.'s Opposition due 06/13/11; SuccessFactors, Inc.'s Reply due 06/17/11. Motion to Compel to be heard on 06/21/11 or 06/22/11. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman, on 6/9/2011. (bzsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/9/2011) Modified on 6/10/2011 (jlm, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 PATRICK E. PREMO (CSB NO. 184915) ppremo@fenwick.com LIWEN MAH (CSB NO. 239033) lmah@fenwick.com SEBASTIAN KAPLAN (CSB NO. 248206) skaplan@fenwick.com GUINEVERE L. JOBSON (CSB NO. 251907) gjobson@fenwick.com FENWICK & WEST LLP Silicon Valley Center 801 California Street Mountain View, California 94041 Telephone: (650) 988-8500 Facsimile: (650) 938-5200 8 9 Attorneys for Plaintiff SUCCESSFACTORS, INC. MOUNTAIN VIEW NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 ATTORNEYS AT LAW UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 F ENWICK & W EST LLP 10 OAKLAND DIVISION 13 14 SUCCESSFACTORS, INC., Plaintiff, 15 16 17 Case No. 10-05471-SBA (BZ) STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR SUCCESSFACTORS’ MOTION TO COMPEL v. HALOGEN SOFTWARE, INC., a Canadian corporation; and DOES 1-5, inclusive, Courtroom: G, 15th Floor Judge: Honorable Bernard Zimmerman 18 Defendants. 19 20 STIPULATION 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 WHEREAS, the Court has given Plaintiff SuccessFactors, Inc. (“SuccessFactors”) leave to move to compel Defendant Halogen Software, Inc. (“Halogen”); WHEREAS, following a meet-and-confer on May 31, 2011, the Court instructed counsel for the parties to confer about a briefing schedule for any such motion to compel by SuccessFactors; WHEREAS, no previous briefing schedule has been set for SuccessFactors’ motion to compel; 28 STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR SUCCESSFACTORS’ MOTION TO COMPEL CASE NO.: 10-05471-SBA (BZ) 1 2 WHEREAS, counsel for the parties agree that the following briefing schedule is appropriate and will not affect the overall schedule of this case; 3 NOW, THEREFORE, SuccessFactors and Halogen STIPULATE AND AGREE that 4 SuccessFactors will file its motion to compel on June 6, 2011, that Halogen will file any opposition to 5 the motion to compel on or before June 13, 2011, and that SuccessFactors will file its reply on or 6 before June 17, 2011. SuccessFactors and Halogen further STIPULATE AND AGREE that 7 SuccessFactors’ motion to compel shall be heard on June 21 or 22, 2011 if necessary, or on such other 8 date set by the Court. 9 10 IT IS SO STIPULATED. Dated: June 6, 2011 FENWICK & WEST LLP 11 /s/ Patrick E. Premo Patrick E. Premo Attorneys for Plaintiff SUCCESSFACTORS, INC. By MOUNTAIN VIEW ATTORNEYS AT LAW F ENWICK & W EST LLP 12 13 14 15 Dated: June 6, 2011 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP 16 /s/ Evette Pennypacker By ________________________________ Evette Pennypacker Attorneys for Defendant HALOGEN SOFTWARE, INC. 17 18 19 ATTORNEY ATTESTATION 20 21 Pursuant to General Order 45, I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this 22 document has been obtained from the signatory indicated by a ‘conformed’ signature (/S/) within 23 this e -filed document. 24 /s/ Liwen Mah Liwen Mah 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR SUCCESSFACTORS’ MOTION TO COMPEL 2 CASE NO.: 10-05471-SBA (BZ) 1 2 3 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. , except that no hearing will occur unless scheduled by the Court. 9 Dated: June ___, 2011 ______________________________________ Honorable Bernard Zimmerman Magistrate Judge United States District Court 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 MOUNTAIN VIEW ATTORNEYS AT LAW F ENWICK & W EST LLP 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR SUCCESSFACTORS’ MOTION TO COMPEL 3 CASE NO.: 10-05471-SBA (BZ)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?