Affinity Labs of Texas, LLC v. Nike, Inc. et al

Filing 141

ORDER Granting 140 Stipulation and Joint Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 9/27/2011. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/27/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13

Richard L. Seabolt, Esq. (SBN 67469)
DUANE MORRIS LLP
Spear Tower
One Market Plaza, Suite 2200
San Francisco, CA 94105-1127
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 415.957.3001
L. Norwood Jameson (admitted pro hac vice)
Matthew C. Gaudet (admitted pro hac vice)
DUANE MORRIS LLP
Atlantic Center Plaza
1180 West Peachtree Street N.W., Suite 700
Atlanta, GA 30309-3448
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 404.581.5951
E-Mail: [e-mail]
E-Mail: [e-mail]
E-Mail: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff Affinity Labs of Texas, LLC

14
15

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
OAKLAND DIVISION

16
17
18

AFFINITY LABS OF TEXAS, LLC, a
Texas Limited Liability Company,

19

Plaintiff and
CounterclaimDefendant,

20
21
22
23

CASE NO. 4:10-cv-5543-CW
STIPULATION AND JOINT MOTION TO
DISMISS; [PROPOSED] ORDER
Judge: Hon. Claudia Wilken

v.
NIKE, INC., an Oregon Corporation,
and APPLE INC., a California
Corporation,

24
25

Defendants and
Counterclaim-Plaintiffs.

26
27
28
CASE NO. 4:10-CV-5543-CW

STIPULATION AND JOINT MOTION TO
DISMISS; [PROPOSED] ORDER

1

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41, Plaintiff Affinity Labs of Texas, LLC (“Affinity”) and

2

Defendants Apple Inc. (“Apple”) and Nike, Inc. (“Nike”), by and through their counsel of record,

3

hereby stipulate and request that the Court order as follows:

4

(1)

5

prejudice;

6
7
8
9
10

(2)

All claims asserted by Affinity against Apple in this action shall be dismissed with

All counterclaims asserted by Apple against Affinity in this action shall be dismissed

without prejudice;
(3)

All claims asserted by Affinity against Nike in this action shall be dismissed with

prejudice;

11

(4)

12

without prejudice;

13

(5)

Affinity, Apple, and Nike each shall bear their own costs and attorneys’ fees; and

(6)

The Court shall retain jurisdiction over this action to enforce the agreement between

14
15
16

All counterclaims asserted by Nike against Affinity in this action shall be dismissed

the parties resolving this action.

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
CASE NO. 4:10-CV-5543-CW

STIPULATION AND JOINT MOTION TO
DISMISS; [PROPOSED] ORDER

3

RICHARD L. SEABOLT
L. NORWOOD JAMESON
MATTHEW C. GAUDET
THOMAS W. SANKEY
BRIAN MCQUILLEN

4

DUANE MORRIS LLP

1

Dated: September 23, 2011

2

5
By: /s/ Matthew C. Gaudet
Matthew C. Gaudet

6
7

Attorneys for Plaintiff and CounterclaimDefendant AFFINITY LABS OF TEXAS,
LLC

8
9
10

Dated: September 23, 2011

11
12

O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP

13
14

By: /s/ Darin W. Snyder
Darin W. Snyder

15
16

Attorneys for Defendant and CounterclaimPlaintiff APPLE INC.

17
18

GEORGE A. RILEY
DARIN W. SNYDER
RYAN K. YAGURA
DARIN J. GLASSER
NICHOLAS J. WHILT

Dated: September 23, 2011

Heidi L. Keefe
Jeffrey T. Norberg

19

COOLEY, LLP

20

Christopher J. Renk
Erik S. Maurer
Michael J. Harris
Audra Eidem Heinze

21
22

BANNER & WITCOFF, LTD.

23
24

By: /s/ Michael J. Harris
Michael J. Harris

25
26

Attorneys for Defendant and CounterclaimPlaintiff NIKE, INC.

27
28

3
CASE NO. 4:10-CV-5543-CW

STIPULATION AND JOINT MOTION TO
DISMISS; [PROPOSED] ORDER

1

Pursuant to General Order No. 45 X(B), I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this

2

document has been obtained from Darin W. Snyder and Michael J. Harris.

3

Dated: September 23, 2011

4
5
6

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED:

7
8

9/27/2011
Dated:______________

9

________________________________________
Honorable Claudia Wilken
United States District Judge

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
CASE NO. 4:10-CV-5543-CW

STIPULATION AND JOINT MOTION TO
DISMISS; [PROPOSED] ORDER