Ordick v. Unionbancal Corporation et al

Filing 49

ORDER re 48 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Continue Final Approval filed by Unionbancal Corporation, Lynn Ordick, Union Bank, N.A., Set/Reset Deadlines as to 48 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Continue Final Approval, 43 MO TION Unopposed Motion for Order Granting Final Approval of Class Action Settlement , 40 MOTION for Attorney Fees, Costs, Claims Administration Expenses and Incentive Award. Motion Hearing set for 11/27/2012 01:00 PM before Hon. Saundra Brown Armstrong.. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 11/8/12. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/8/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION 7 8 9 10 11 LYNN ODRICK, an individual, on behalf of all others similarly situated and the general public, ALEXANDER  KRAKOW + GLICK LLP Assigned to the Hon. Saundra Brown Armstrong Filed: December 8, 2010 Courtroom 1 Plaintiff, 12 13 Case No. CV 10 5565 SBA vs. 15 16 ORDER RE: STIPULATION TO CONTINUE FINAL APPROVAL HEARING FROM NOVEMBER 21, 2012 TO NOVEMBER 27, 2012 UNIONBANCAL CORPORATION, a Corporation, UNION BANK, N.A., a corporation, and DOES 1-10 Defendants. 14 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 0 ORDER RE: STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE APPLICATION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES Case No. 10-cv-5565-SBA 1 Having reviewed the Stipulation to Continue Final Approval Hearing from 2 November 21, 2012 to November 27, 2012, and finding good cause appearing, the Court 3 HEREBY ORDERS AS FOLLOWS: 4 5 1. The Final Approval hearing shall be continued from November 21, 2012 at 1:00 pm to November 27, 2012, at 1:00 pm. 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 9 Dated: _11/8/12 _____________________________ Hon. Saundra Brown Armstrong United States District Court Judge Northern District of California 10 11 ALEXANDER  KRAKOW + GLICK LLP 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 ORDER RE: STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE APPLICATION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES Case No. 10-cv-5565-SBA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?