Ordick v. Unionbancal Corporation et al
Filing
49
ORDER re 48 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Continue Final Approval filed by Unionbancal Corporation, Lynn Ordick, Union Bank, N.A., Set/Reset Deadlines as to 48 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Continue Final Approval, 43 MO TION Unopposed Motion for Order Granting Final Approval of Class Action Settlement , 40 MOTION for Attorney Fees, Costs, Claims Administration Expenses and Incentive Award. Motion Hearing set for 11/27/2012 01:00 PM before Hon. Saundra Brown Armstrong.. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 11/8/12. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/8/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
OAKLAND DIVISION
7
8
9
10
11
LYNN ODRICK, an individual, on behalf of
all others similarly situated and the general
public,
ALEXANDER KRAKOW + GLICK LLP
Assigned to the Hon. Saundra Brown
Armstrong
Filed: December 8, 2010
Courtroom 1
Plaintiff,
12
13
Case No. CV 10 5565 SBA
vs.
15
16
ORDER RE: STIPULATION TO
CONTINUE FINAL APPROVAL
HEARING FROM NOVEMBER 21, 2012
TO NOVEMBER 27, 2012
UNIONBANCAL CORPORATION, a
Corporation, UNION BANK, N.A., a
corporation, and DOES 1-10
Defendants.
14
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
0
ORDER RE: STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE APPLICATION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES
Case No. 10-cv-5565-SBA
1
Having reviewed the Stipulation to Continue Final Approval Hearing from
2
November 21, 2012 to November 27, 2012, and finding good cause appearing, the Court
3
HEREBY ORDERS AS FOLLOWS:
4
5
1.
The Final Approval hearing shall be continued from November 21, 2012 at
1:00 pm to November 27, 2012, at 1:00 pm.
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
9
Dated: _11/8/12
_____________________________
Hon. Saundra Brown Armstrong
United States District Court Judge
Northern District of California
10
11
ALEXANDER KRAKOW + GLICK LLP
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
ORDER RE: STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE APPLICATION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES
Case No. 10-cv-5565-SBA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?