Iverson v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Filing 23

ORDER re 22 Stipulation filed by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., David Iverson. Signed by Judge Beeler on 10/4/2011. (lblc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/4/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 HOFFMAN EMPLOYMENT LAWYERS, LLP MICHAEL HOFFMAN (State Bar No. 154481) 100 Pine Street, Suite 1550 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 362-1111 Fax: (415) 362-1112 Email: mhoffman@employment-lawyers.com Attorneys for Plaintiff DAVID IVERSEN 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 MALCOLM A. HEINICKE (State Bar No. 194174) CAROLYN V. ZABRYCKI (State Bar No. 263541) MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP 560 Mission Street Twenty-Seventh Floor San Francisco, CA 94105-2907 Telephone: (415) 512-4000 Facsimile: (415) 512-4077 E-mail: Malcolm.Heinicke@mto.com Carolyn.Zabrycki@mto.com Attorneys for Defendant WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 DAVID IVERSEN, on behalf of himself, and all others similarly situated Plaintiff, vs. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., a corporation, and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive. Defendant. Case No. CV-10-05566 LB STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Judge: Honorable Laurel Beeler Current Date: October 6, 2011 Proposed Date: December 8, 2011 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Stipulation and [Proposed] Order; CV-10-05566 LB 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed this putative class action alleging state wage and hour claims concerning his employment at Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.; WHEREAS, the parties previously appeared before this Court at the Initial Case Management Conference on March 31, 2011 at 10:30 a.m.; WHEREAS, the parties are scheduled to appear at a Further Case Management Conference on October 6, 2011 at 10:30 a.m.; WHEREAS, the parties have completed their initial meet and confer sessions and have exchanged initial disclosures; WHEREAS, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. has responded to written discovery, i.e., numerous special interrogatories; WHEREAS, the parties have commenced the process of meeting and conferring over depositions; WHEREAS, the parties respectfully submit that it would be most efficient to conduct a Further Case Management Conference after discovery has progressed further; 15 WHEREAS, the parties, through their counsel of record, stipulate as follows: 16 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED that the parties jointly and respectfully request an order 17 postponing the Further Case Management Conference currently set for October 6, 2011 until 18 December 8, 2011 at 10:30 a.m. or such other time thereafter that the Court is available. 19 20 DATED: September 29, 2011 HOFFMAN EMPLOYMENT LAWYERS, L.L.P. 21 22 By: 23 24 /s/Michael Hoffman MICHAEL HOFFMAN Attorneys for Plaintiff DAVID IVERSEN 25 26 27 28 -1- Stipulation and [Proposed] Order; CV-10-05566 LB 1 DATED: September 29, 2011 MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP 2 3 By: /s/ Malcolm A. Heinicke MALCOLM A. HEINICKE 4 Attorneys for Defendant WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. 5 6 7 8 Filer’s Attestation 9 I, Malcolm A. Heinicke, am the ECF user whose identification and password are being 10 used to file this STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER POSTPONING FURTHER 11 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. In compliance with General Order 45.X.B, I hereby 12 attest that Michael Hoffman concurs in this filing. 13 DATED: September 29, 2011 14 /s/ Malcolm A. Heinicke MALCOLM A. HEINICKE 15 16 17 [PROPOSED] ORDER 18 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. Specifically, the Court orders 20 that the Further Case Management Conference currently set for October 6, 2011 at 10:30 a.m. is 21 postponed until December 8, 2011 at 10:30 a.m. 22 October 4, 2011 DATED: September _____, 2011 O IT IS S D E ORDER R NIA By: UNIT ED 23 S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O S 19 Laurel Beeler United States Magistrate Judge Beeler el NO aur Judge L ER 27 A H 26 FO RT 25 LI 24 N F D IS T IC T O R C 28 -2- Stipulation and [Proposed] Order; CV-10-05566 LB

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?