Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. San Anselmo Post, No. 179, The American Legion, Department of California
Filing
27
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 26 Stipulation, filed by San Anselmo Post, No. 179, The American Legion, Department of California, Joe Hand Promotions, Inc., ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 10/21/11. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/24/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
Thomas P. Riley, SBN 194706
LAW OFFICES OF THOMAS P. RILEY, P.C.
First Library Square
1114 Fremont Avenue
South Pasadena, CA 91030-3227
Tel: 626-799-9797
Fax: 626-799-9795
TPRLAW@att.net
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
10
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.,
CASE NO. CV 10-5592 SBA
11
Plaintiff,
12
vs.
13
14
15
16
San Anselmo Post, No. 179, The
American Legion, Department of
California, et al.,
17
Defendants.
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF
PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT
AGAINST DEFENDANT SAN
ANSELMO POST, NO. 179, THE
AMERICAN LEGION,
DEPARTMENT OF CALIFORNIA, an
unknown business entity d/b/a LOG
CABIN DUGOUT BAR A/K/A THE
DUGOUT
18
19
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff JOE HAND
20
PROMOTIONS, INC. and Defendant SAN ANSELMO POST, NO. 179, THE
21
AMERICAN LEGION, DEPARTMENT OF CALIFORNIA, an unknown business
22
entity d/b/a LOG CABIN DUGOUT BAR A/K/A THE DUGOUT that the above-
23
entitled action is hereby dismissed with prejudice against SAN ANSELMO POST,
24
NO. 179, THE AMERICAN LEGION, DEPARTMENT OF CALIFORNIA, an
25
unknown business entity d/b/a LOG CABIN DUGOUT BAR A/K/A THE DUGOUT,
26
an unknown business entity d/b/a LOG CABIN DUGOUT BAR A/K/A THE
27
28
DUGOUT.
///
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
«CaseNo»
PAGE 1
1
2
This dismissal is made pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1).
Each Party referenced-above shall bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs.
3
4
5
6
7
Dated: September 23, 2011
s/ Thomas P. Riley
LAW OFFICES OF THOMAS P. RILEY, P.C.
By: Thomas P. Riley
Attorneys for Plaintiff
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC.
Dated:
s/ Geoffrey Gordon-Creed
GORDON-CREED, KELLEY,
HOLL & SUGERMAN, LLP
By: Geoffrey Gordon-Creed
Attorneys for Defendant
SAN ANSELMO POST, NO. 179, THE AMERICAN
LEGION, DEPARTMENT OF CALIFORNIA, an
unknown business entity d/b/a
LOG CABIN DUGOUT BAR A/K/A THE DUGOUT
8
9
10
11
12
13
September 23, 2011
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
IT IS SO ORDERED:
23
24
25
26
27
Dated:10/21/11
The Honorable Saundra Brown Armstrong
United States District Court
Northern District of California
28
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
«CaseNo»
PAGE 2
1
PROOF OF SERVICE (SERVICE BY MAIL)
2
3
I declare that:
4
I am employed in the County of Los Angeles, California. I am over the age of
5
eighteen years and not a party to the within cause; my business address is First Library
6
Square, 1114 Fremont Avenue, South Pasadena, California 91030. I am readily familiar
7
8
with this law firm's practice for collection and processing of correspondence/documents
for mail in the ordinary course of business.
9
On September 14, 2011, I served:
10
11
12
13
14
15
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT
AGAINST DEFENDANT SAN ANSELMO POST, NO. 179, THE
AMERICAN LEGION, DEPARTMENT OF CALIFORNIA, an unknown
business entity d/b/a LOG CABIN DUGOUT BAR A/K/A THE DUGOUT
On all parties in said cause by enclosing a true copy thereof in a sealed envelope
with postage prepaid and following ordinary business practices, said envelope was duly
16
mailed and addressed to:
17
18
19
20
Mr. Geoffrey Gordon-Creed, Esquire (Attorneys for Defendant)
GORDON-CREED, KELLEY, HOLL & SUGERMAN, LLP
222 Kearny Street, Suite 650
San Francisco, CA 94108
21
I declare under the penalty of perjury pursuant to the laws of the United States
22
that the foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration was executed on
23
September 14, 2011, at South Pasadena, California.
24
25
26
Dated: September 14 2011
INESA MAMIDJANYAN
27
28
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
«CaseNo»
PAGE 3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?